The "nexthop" column in the northbound database is deprecated in favor
of the "nexthops" column. However, the "nexthops" column only matters if
the policy is a "reroute" policy. Therefore, we can ignore the fact that
a deprecated column has its value set if the policy type does not rely
on nexthops at all.

Signed-off-by: Mark Michelson <[email protected]>
---
v1 -> v2:
 * Added a NEWS entry about this change.
 * Updated ovn-nb documentation so that it does not imply that the
   "nexthop" column is used.
---
 NEWS                       |  5 +++
 northd/en-route-policies.c | 17 +++++-----
 ovn-nb.xml                 |  3 +-
 tests/ovn-northd.at        | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS
index c4ebe5c39..f177b7f32 100644
--- a/NEWS
+++ b/NEWS
@@ -1,5 +1,10 @@
 Post v26.09.0
 --------------
+   - Router policies that used the deprecated "nexthop" column used to
+     always be skipped and not applied. Now these router policies are
+     only skipped if their action is "reroute". Router policies of type
+     "allow", "drop", and "jump" will still be accepted, even if the
+     "nexthop" column is set on those policies.
    - Learn ARP sender hardware address (arp.sha) and IPv6 Neighbor
      Discovery link-layer addresses (nd.tll, nd.sll) into the FDB
      table in addition to eth.src.  This allows VRRP virtual MACs to
diff --git a/northd/en-route-policies.c b/northd/en-route-policies.c
index 9597980ec..2110b8b60 100644
--- a/northd/en-route-policies.c
+++ b/northd/en-route-policies.c
@@ -176,14 +176,6 @@ build_route_policies(struct ovn_datapath *od,
     for (int i = 0; i < od->nbr->n_policies; i++) {
         const struct nbrec_logical_router_policy *rule = od->nbr->policies[i];
 
-        if (rule->nexthop && rule->nexthop[0]) {
-            static struct vlog_rate_limit rl = VLOG_RATE_LIMIT_INIT(1, 1);
-            VLOG_WARN_RL(&rl, "Logical router: %s, policy uses deprecated"
-                         " column \"nexthop\", this column is ignored. Please"
-                         "use \"nexthops\" column instead.", od->nbr->name);
-            continue;
-        }
-
         size_t n_valid_nexthops = 0;
         char **valid_nexthops = NULL;
         uint32_t chain_id = 0;
@@ -224,6 +216,15 @@ build_route_policies(struct ovn_datapath *od,
         }
 
         if (!strcmp(rule->action, "reroute")) {
+            if (rule->nexthop && rule->nexthop[0]) {
+                static struct vlog_rate_limit rl = VLOG_RATE_LIMIT_INIT(1, 1);
+                VLOG_WARN_RL(&rl, "Logical router: %s, policy uses deprecated"
+                             " column \"nexthop\", this policy is skipped. "
+                             "Please use \"nexthops\" column instead.",
+                             od->nbr->name);
+                continue;
+            }
+
             if (rule->output_port && rule->n_nexthops != 1) {
                 static struct vlog_rate_limit rl = VLOG_RATE_LIMIT_INIT(5, 1);
                 VLOG_WARN_RL(&rl,
diff --git a/ovn-nb.xml b/ovn-nb.xml
index feea50a25..ebcd3e4d1 100644
--- a/ovn-nb.xml
+++ b/ovn-nb.xml
@@ -5368,8 +5368,7 @@ or
         </li>
 
         <li>
-          <code>reroute</code>: Reroute packet to <ref column="nexthop"/> or
-          <ref column="nexthops"/>.
+          <code>reroute</code>: Reroute packet to <ref column="nexthops"/>
         </li>
 
         <li>
diff --git a/tests/ovn-northd.at b/tests/ovn-northd.at
index 7bd0466c6..1401aecea 100644
--- a/tests/ovn-northd.at
+++ b/tests/ovn-northd.at
@@ -25135,3 +25135,69 @@ CHECK_NO_CHANGE_AFTER_RECOMPUTE
 OVN_CLEANUP_NORTHD
 AT_CLEANUP
 ])
+
+OVN_FOR_EACH_NORTHD_NO_HV([
+AT_SETUP([Router policy selective nexthop deprecation warning])
+ovn_start
+
+check ovn-nbctl lr-add lr0
+check ovn-nbctl lrp-add lr0 lr0-p1 00:00:00:00:00:01 172.16.1.1/24
+
+# Add a policy of each type to this router
+check ovn-nbctl lr-policy-add lr0 100 "ip4.src == 10.0.0.0/24" allow
+check ovn-nbctl lr-policy-add lr0 100 "ip4.src == 20.0.0.0/24" drop
+check ovn-nbctl lr-policy-add lr0 100 "ip4.src == 30.0.0.0/24" reroute 
172.16.1.50
+check ovn-nbctl lr-policy-add lr0 100 "ip4.src == 40.0.0.0/24" jump target
+check ovn-nbctl --chain=target lr-policy-add lr0 200 "1" allow
+check ovn-nbctl --wait=sb sync
+
+# Let's double-check that all of the expected flows are present
+AT_CHECK([ovn-sbctl lflow-list lr0 | grep "lr_in_policy[[^_]]" | 
ovn_strip_lflows | sort], [0], [dnl
+  table=??(lr_in_policy       ), priority=0    , match=(1), 
action=(reg8[[0..15]] = 0; next;)
+  table=??(lr_in_policy       ), priority=100  , match=(reg9[[16..31]] == 0 && 
(ip4.src == 10.0.0.0/24)), action=(reg8[[0..15]] = 0; next;)
+  table=??(lr_in_policy       ), priority=100  , match=(reg9[[16..31]] == 0 && 
(ip4.src == 20.0.0.0/24)), action=(drop;)
+  table=??(lr_in_policy       ), priority=100  , match=(reg9[[16..31]] == 0 && 
(ip4.src == 30.0.0.0/24)), action=(reg0 = 172.16.1.50; reg5 = 172.16.1.1; 
eth.src = 00:00:00:00:00:01; outport = "lr0-p1"; flags.loopback = 1; 
reg8[[0..15]] = 0; reg9[[9]] = 1; next;)
+  table=??(lr_in_policy       ), priority=100  , match=(reg9[[16..31]] == 0 && 
(ip4.src == 40.0.0.0/24)), action=(reg9[[16..31]]=1; next(pipeline=ingress, 
table=??);)
+  table=??(lr_in_policy       ), priority=200  , match=(reg9[[16..31]] == 1 && 
(1)), action=(reg8[[0..15]] = 0; next;)
+])
+
+allow_uuid=$(fetch_column nb:Logical_Router_Policy _uuid priority=100 
action=allow)
+drop_uuid=$(fetch_column nb:Logical_Router_Policy _uuid priority=100 
action=drop)
+jump_uuid=$(fetch_column nb:Logical_Router_Policy _uuid priority=100 
action=jump)
+reroute_uuid=$(fetch_column nb:Logical_Router_Policy _uuid priority=100 
action=reroute)
+
+# For the allow, drop, and jump policies, we'll set the "nexthop" column. The 
policies
+# should remain unchanged, and we shouldn't see a warning in the log.
+check ovn-nbctl set Logical_Router_Policy $allow_uuid nexthop=50.0.0.50
+check ovn-nbctl set Logical_Router_Policy $drop_uuid nexthop=50.0.0.50
+check ovn-nbctl set Logical_Router_Policy $jump_uuid nexthop=50.0.0.50
+check ovn-nbctl --wait=sb sync
+
+AT_CHECK([grep -qE "policy uses deprecated" northd/ovn-northd.log], [1])
+
+AT_CHECK([ovn-sbctl lflow-list lr0 | grep "lr_in_policy[[^_]]" | 
ovn_strip_lflows | sort], [0], [dnl
+  table=??(lr_in_policy       ), priority=0    , match=(1), 
action=(reg8[[0..15]] = 0; next;)
+  table=??(lr_in_policy       ), priority=100  , match=(reg9[[16..31]] == 0 && 
(ip4.src == 10.0.0.0/24)), action=(reg8[[0..15]] = 0; next;)
+  table=??(lr_in_policy       ), priority=100  , match=(reg9[[16..31]] == 0 && 
(ip4.src == 20.0.0.0/24)), action=(drop;)
+  table=??(lr_in_policy       ), priority=100  , match=(reg9[[16..31]] == 0 && 
(ip4.src == 30.0.0.0/24)), action=(reg0 = 172.16.1.50; reg5 = 172.16.1.1; 
eth.src = 00:00:00:00:00:01; outport = "lr0-p1"; flags.loopback = 1; 
reg8[[0..15]] = 0; reg9[[9]] = 1; next;)
+  table=??(lr_in_policy       ), priority=100  , match=(reg9[[16..31]] == 0 && 
(ip4.src == 40.0.0.0/24)), action=(reg9[[16..31]]=1; next(pipeline=ingress, 
table=??);)
+  table=??(lr_in_policy       ), priority=200  , match=(reg9[[16..31]] == 1 && 
(1)), action=(reg8[[0..15]] = 0; next;)
+])
+
+# Now let's set the "nexthop" column on the reroute policy. This should result 
in the
+# warning appearing and the reroute policy not showing up in the lflows.
+check ovn-nbctl set Logical_Router_Policy $reroute_uuid nexthop=50.0.0.50
+check ovn-nbctl --wait=sb sync
+
+AT_CHECK([grep -qE "policy uses deprecated" northd/ovn-northd.log], [0])
+AT_CHECK([ovn-sbctl lflow-list lr0 | grep "lr_in_policy[[^_]]" | 
ovn_strip_lflows | sort], [0], [dnl
+  table=??(lr_in_policy       ), priority=0    , match=(1), 
action=(reg8[[0..15]] = 0; next;)
+  table=??(lr_in_policy       ), priority=100  , match=(reg9[[16..31]] == 0 && 
(ip4.src == 10.0.0.0/24)), action=(reg8[[0..15]] = 0; next;)
+  table=??(lr_in_policy       ), priority=100  , match=(reg9[[16..31]] == 0 && 
(ip4.src == 20.0.0.0/24)), action=(drop;)
+  table=??(lr_in_policy       ), priority=100  , match=(reg9[[16..31]] == 0 && 
(ip4.src == 40.0.0.0/24)), action=(reg9[[16..31]]=1; next(pipeline=ingress, 
table=??);)
+  table=??(lr_in_policy       ), priority=200  , match=(reg9[[16..31]] == 1 && 
(1)), action=(reg8[[0..15]] = 0; next;)
+])
+
+OVN_CLEANUP_NORTHD
+AT_CLEANUP
+])
-- 
2.55.0

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to