LGTM, 
just wondering if a further comment would help, 
eg something like

+/* random_uint32() returns a value in the [0; UINT32_MAX] range.
+   For our checking to be correct we would need instead a random value
+   in the range [0; UINT32_MAX - 1]. To avoid further computation 
+   we use a decreased range of available values for 'emc-insert-inv-prob'
+   ie [0; 2**20 - 1]. */
+#define EM_FLOW_INSERT_INV_PROB_SHIFT 20
+#define EM_FLOW_INSERT_INV_PROB_MAX  (1 << EM_FLOW_INSERT_INV_PROB_SHIFT)
+#define EM_FLOW_INSERT_INV_PROB_MASK (EM_FLOW_INSERT_INV_PROB_MAX - 1)

?

-Antonio

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ovs-dev-boun...@openvswitch.org [mailto:ovs-dev-boun...@openvswitch.org]
> On Behalf Of Ilya Maximets
> Sent: Monday, July 31, 2017 3:41 PM
> To: ovs-dev@openvswitch.org
> Cc: Heetae Ahn <heetae82....@samsung.com>; Ilya Maximets
> <i.maxim...@samsung.com>
> Subject: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] dpif-netdev: Decrease range of values for 
> EMC
> probability.
> 
> Currently, real insertion probability is higher than configured
> for the maximum case because of wrong usage of the random value.
> 
> i.e. if 'emc-invert-inv-prob' == UINT32_MAX, then 'emc_insert_min'
> equals to 1. In this case we're allowing insert if random vailue
> is less or equal to 1. So, two of 2**32 values (0 and 1) are
> allowed and real probability is 2 times higher than configured.
> 
> This happens because 'random_uint32()' returns value in range
> [0; UINT32_MAX], but for the checking to be correct we should
> generate random value in range [0; UINT32_MAX - 1].
> 
> To fix this we have 4 possible solutions:
> 
>  1. need to use uint64_t for 'emc-insert-min' and calculate it
>     as '(UINT32_MAX + 1) / inverse_prob' to fairly check the full
>     range [0; UINT32_MAX].
> 
>     This may decrease performance becaue of 64 bit atomic ops.
> 
>  2. Forbid the '2**32 - 1' as the value for 'emc-insert-min'
>     because it's the only value we have issues with.
> 
>     This will require additional explanations and not very friendly
>     for users.
> 
>  3. Generate random value in range [0; UINT32_MAX - 1].
> 
>     This will require heavy division operation.
> 
>  4. Decrease the range of available values for 'emc-insert-inv-prob'.
> 
>     Actually, we don't need to have so much different values for
>     that option. I beleve that values higher than 1M are completely
>     useless. Choosing the upper limit as a power of 2 like 2**20 we
>     will be able to mask the generated random value in a fast way
>     and also avoid range issue, because same uint32_t can be used to
>     store 2**20.
> 
> This patch implements solution #4.
> 
> CC: Ciara Loftus <ciara.lof...@intel.com>
> Fixes: 4c30b24602c3 ("dpif-netdev: Conditional EMC insert")
> Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets <i.maxim...@samsung.com>
> ---
> 
> Infrastructure and logic introduced here will be used for fixing
> emc replacement policy.
> 
>  lib/dpif-netdev.c    | 12 ++++++++----
>  vswitchd/vswitch.xml |  3 ++-
>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/dpif-netdev.c b/lib/dpif-netdev.c
> index 47a9fa0..123a7c9 100644
> --- a/lib/dpif-netdev.c
> +++ b/lib/dpif-netdev.c
> @@ -152,9 +152,12 @@ struct netdev_flow_key {
>  #define EM_FLOW_HASH_MASK (EM_FLOW_HASH_ENTRIES - 1)
>  #define EM_FLOW_HASH_SEGS 2
> 
> +#define EM_FLOW_INSERT_INV_PROB_SHIFT 20
> +#define EM_FLOW_INSERT_INV_PROB_MAX  (1 << EM_FLOW_INSERT_INV_PROB_SHIFT)
> +#define EM_FLOW_INSERT_INV_PROB_MASK (EM_FLOW_INSERT_INV_PROB_MAX - 1)
>  /* Default EMC insert probability is 1 / DEFAULT_EM_FLOW_INSERT_INV_PROB */
>  #define DEFAULT_EM_FLOW_INSERT_INV_PROB 100
> -#define DEFAULT_EM_FLOW_INSERT_MIN (UINT32_MAX /                     \
> +#define DEFAULT_EM_FLOW_INSERT_MIN (EM_FLOW_INSERT_INV_PROB_MAX /        \
>                                      DEFAULT_EM_FLOW_INSERT_INV_PROB)
> 
>  struct emc_entry {
> @@ -2077,7 +2080,7 @@ emc_probabilistic_insert(struct dp_netdev_pmd_thread
> *pmd,
>      uint32_t min;
>      atomic_read_relaxed(&pmd->dp->emc_insert_min, &min);
> 
> -    if (min && random_uint32() <= min) {
> +    if (min && (random_uint32() & EM_FLOW_INSERT_INV_PROB_MASK) < min) {
>          emc_insert(&pmd->flow_cache, key, flow);
>      }
>  }
> @@ -2894,8 +2897,9 @@ dpif_netdev_set_config(struct dpif *dpif, const struct
> smap *other_config)
>      }
> 
>      atomic_read_relaxed(&dp->emc_insert_min, &cur_min);
> -    if (insert_prob <= UINT32_MAX) {
> -        insert_min = insert_prob == 0 ? 0 : UINT32_MAX / insert_prob;
> +    if (insert_prob < EM_FLOW_INSERT_INV_PROB_MAX) {
> +        insert_min = insert_prob == 0
> +                     ? 0 : EM_FLOW_INSERT_INV_PROB_MAX / insert_prob;
>      } else {
>          insert_min = DEFAULT_EM_FLOW_INSERT_MIN;
>          insert_prob = DEFAULT_EM_FLOW_INSERT_INV_PROB;
> diff --git a/vswitchd/vswitch.xml b/vswitchd/vswitch.xml
> index 074535b..61f252e 100644
> --- a/vswitchd/vswitch.xml
> +++ b/vswitchd/vswitch.xml
> @@ -381,7 +381,8 @@
>        </column>
> 
>        <column name="other_config" key="emc-insert-inv-prob"
> -              type='{"type": "integer", "minInteger": 0, "maxInteger":
> 4294967295}'>
> +              type='{"type": "integer",
> +                     "minInteger": 0, "maxInteger": 1048575}'>
>          <p>
>            Specifies the inverse probability (1/emc-insert-inv-prob) of a flow
>            being inserted into the Exact Match Cache (EMC). On average one in
> --
> 2.7.4
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> d...@openvswitch.org
> https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to