On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 10:56:30PM -0700, Gurucharan Shetty wrote: > We had one note about the issues with adding OVS interfaces > in the "auto" section. This commit adds another note about > how adding OVS bridges in the "auto" section can cause > race conditions with systemd. > > Signed-off-by: Gurucharan Shetty <[email protected]> > --- > debian/openvswitch-switch.README.Debian | 8 ++++++++ > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/debian/openvswitch-switch.README.Debian > b/debian/openvswitch-switch.README.Debian > index 5f8f823..d236824 100644 > --- a/debian/openvswitch-switch.README.Debian > +++ b/debian/openvswitch-switch.README.Debian > @@ -231,3 +231,11 @@ in the 'auto' section, openvswitch-switch will > forcefully be started when > ifupdown kicks in. In a case like this, the admin needs to make sure that > /usr > has already been mounted and that a remote $syslog (if used) is ready to > receive openvswitch logs. > + > +* With systemd, adding openvswitch bridges in the 'auto' section of the > +'interfaces' file can cause race conditions. Debian systems have added a > +systemd [email protected] file. This file will call ifdown and ifup on > interfaces > +in "auto" section automatically when they disappear and appear respectively. > +This will cause race conditions if you delete and add the same bridges using > +tools like "ovs-vsctl" or "ovs-dpctl". This is also a problem when you > +upgrade your openvswitch kernel module using commands like > 'force-reload-kmod'.
I'm not really sure what the "auto" section is. Do you just mean that they should not add lines like "auto br0" where br0 is an Open vSwitch bridge? (I do see that there is already some wording about an "auto" section.) Thanks, Ben. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
