> Maybe I don't fully understand what you're trying to say, but I want to use > unsafe function in dpif-netdev for per-flow packet batching (see the patch) > and it should not be internal for that case. > (It's safe to use unsafe function there because per-flow batches are > guaranteed to be less than original rx batch.)
Let me try again. As you ave pointed out, it is not really unsafe to use the function at those calling sites, I think dp_packet_batch_add__() is a suitable name. In case you prefer a different function name, that's fine too, I just don't think unsafe is accurate. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
