Aaron Conole <acon...@redhat.com> writes:

> Darrell Ball <db...@vmware.com> writes:
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Aaron Conole <acon...@redhat.com>
>> Date: Thursday, August 10, 2017 at 10:13 AM
>> To: Darrell Ball <db...@vmware.com>
>> Cc: ovs dev <d...@openvswitch.org>
>> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [patch_v4] dp-packet: Reset DPDK HWOL checksum flags 
>> on init.
>>
>>     Darrell Ball <db...@vmware.com> writes:
>>     
>>     > -----Original Message-----
>>     > From: Aaron Conole <acon...@redhat.com>
>>     > Date: Wednesday, August 9, 2017 at 12:51 PM
>>     > To: Darrell Ball <db...@vmware.com>
>>     > Cc: Joe Stringer <j...@ovn.org>, Darrell Ball <dlu...@gmail.com>, ovs
>>     > dev <d...@openvswitch.org>
>>     > Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [patch_v4] dp-packet: Reset DPDK HWOL
>>     > checksum flags on init.
>>     >
>>     >     Darrell Ball <db...@vmware.com> writes:
>>     >     
>>     >     > Thanks Joe
>>     >     > I forgot to add your Tested-by to V5; I have been testing this 
>> myself;
>>     >     > but let me know if you would like it added – I can send a V6.
>>     >     
>>     >     It will automatically be added by patchwork.  It is sufficient to
>>     >     download (ex:
>>     > 
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__patchwork.ozlabs.org_patch_799499_mbox&d=DwIFaQ&c=uilaK90D4TOVoH58JNXRgQ&r=BVhFA09CGX7JQ5Ih-uZnsw&m=LK8s59ajLx5MbmH5Ng8SG1F1nAgKZJ_0JBs7phbl6C8&s=HRG5wrQrEXCl_AA8uAGbroVSvYGUIQjQkF8HrMRvNYI&e=
>>     > )
>>     >     
>>     >     I usually use patchwork when working on a series - if I download 
>> it from
>>     >     patchwork, I can be confident that all the tags are applied 
>> properly, so
>>     >     I won't forget.  Plus, all the discussion happens there, so I can
>>     >     quickly browse it.
>>     >
>>     > Thanks Aaron
>>     > In this case, the Tested-by was applied to V4 and I sent a V5
>>     > which did not have the Tested-by.
>>     > The easiest solution would have been to ask Joe to respond to
>>     > V5 – well, it is moot now anyways with V6 on the way.
>>     
>>     Yep, that happens.
>>     
>>     >     The full list is available at:
>>     >     
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__patchwork.ozlabs.org_project_openvswitch_list_&d=DwIFaQ&c=uilaK90D4TOVoH58JNXRgQ&r=BVhFA09CGX7JQ5Ih-uZnsw&m=LK8s59ajLx5MbmH5Ng8SG1F1nAgKZJ_0JBs7phbl6C8&s=rqaCq5Jr-Vy-cfQ_t5px-zGtdb55CQn9cIAZCC1PvfE&e=
>>     >
>>     > Thanks, I am on this page most of the day (
>>     >     
>>     >     It would actually be cool to have a few more admins to troll 
>> patchwork
>>     >     and do things like ping for status (ex:
>>     >     
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__patchwork.ozlabs.org_patch_719492_&d=DwIFaQ&c=uilaK90D4TOVoH58JNXRgQ&r=BVhFA09CGX7JQ5Ih-uZnsw&m=LK8s59ajLx5MbmH5Ng8SG1F1nAgKZJ_0JBs7phbl6C8&s=y0RPF47IRVw8BujWHzB9oc7IUihgLuCenLfteZ2vUr4&e=
>>     >
>>     > I don’t have any context on this patch.
>>     > Aaron, would you like to resurrect this patch with rebase ?;
>>     > it is RHEL related.
>>     
>>     It doesn't need a rebase; it applies cleanly.  The version of patchwork
>>     running doesn't recognize my ack, so someone will have to add it
>>     manually (or omit it... doesn't matter too much, since Ben ack'd as
>>     well).
>>     
>>     But it would be cool to get it applied;  maybe even to get back as far
>>     as branch-2.7 (I think it was posted in time for 2.7 branch).
>>
>>
>> One thing is I don’t know if Daniele had a chance to test this,
>> although it looks simple enough.
>> Did you get a chance to test it ? if so, maybe a tested-by  ?
>
> I believe I tested it at the time I acked it.  I'll set up a test for it
> tomorrow, though.

Disregard my message (and my ack).  I've tested, but it's not clear how
best to use this.  I'm going to be revisiting this area and seeing what
I can do to make it more friendly.

Thanks, Darrell.

>>     > is this still needed?  it
>>     >     does seem to mostly apply).  Then we could make sure we don't miss
>>     >     things.
>>     >     
>>     >     > Darrell
>>     >     >
>>     >     > -----Original Message-----
>>     >     > From: <ovs-dev-boun...@openvswitch.org> on behalf of Joe
>>     >     > Stringer <j...@ovn.org>
>>     >     > Date: Tuesday, August 8, 2017 at 4:51 PM
>>     >     > To: Darrell Ball <dlu...@gmail.com>
>>     >     > Cc: ovs dev <d...@openvswitch.org>
>>     >     > Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [patch_v4] dp-packet: Reset DPDK HWOL 
>> checksum
>>     >     > flags on init.
>>     >     >
>>     >     >     On 8 August 2017 at 16:39, Darrell Ball <dlu...@gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>>     >     >     > Reset the DPDK HWOL checksum flags in dp_packet_init_.
>>     >     >     > The new HWOL bad checksum flag is uninitialized on
>>     >     >     > non-dpdk ports and
>>     >     >     > this is noticed as test failures using netdev-dummy
>>     >     >     > ports where the bad
>>     >     >     > checksum flag is checked.
>>     >     >     >
>>     >     >     > Fixes: 7451af618e0d ("dp-packet : Update DPDK rx checksum
>>     >     >     > validation functions.")
>>     >     >     > CC: Sugesh Chandran <sugesh.chand...@intel.com>
>>     >     >     > Signed-off-by: Darrell Ball <dlu...@gmail.com>
>>     >     >     > ---
>>     >     >     
>>     >     >     Tested-by: Joe Stringer <j...@ovn.org>
>>     >     >     Tested-at:
>>     >     > 
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__travis-2Dci.org_joestringer_openvswitch_jobs_262464859&d=DwICAg&c=uilaK90D4TOVoH58JNXRgQ&r=BVhFA09CGX7JQ5Ih-uZnsw&m=jXM8RI10bFYBt8zzW6xxX0MRb4YxJ_uCcOdGTE0sfJo&s=d664GG1tgARiN5uEJxebCnczlUnMDtHdWluYN0dRc5g&e=
>>     >     >     
>>     >     >     I'll let those more familiar with this code provide the 
>> review.
>>     >     >     _______________________________________________
>>     >     >     dev mailing list
>>     >     >     d...@openvswitch.org
>>     >     >     
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mail.openvswitch.org_mailman_listinfo_ovs-2Ddev&d=DwICAg&c=uilaK90D4TOVoH58JNXRgQ&r=BVhFA09CGX7JQ5Ih-uZnsw&m=jXM8RI10bFYBt8zzW6xxX0MRb4YxJ_uCcOdGTE0sfJo&s=kCTOzFrO_3CdwW2mM_wcQZXMHDtzpo8cAuKlHSOcxTw&e=
>>     >     >     
>>     >     >
>>     >     > _______________________________________________
>>     >     > dev mailing list
>>     >     > d...@openvswitch.org
>>     >     > 
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mail.openvswitch.org_mailman_listinfo_ovs-2Ddev&d=DwIFaQ&c=uilaK90D4TOVoH58JNXRgQ&r=BVhFA09CGX7JQ5Ih-uZnsw&m=LK8s59ajLx5MbmH5Ng8SG1F1nAgKZJ_0JBs7phbl6C8&s=nnp778JNhzpZBELfmseffsohxJbAQgpKL0BLRS-vlmc&e=
>>     >     
>>     >
>>     > _______________________________________________
>>     > dev mailing list
>>     > d...@openvswitch.org
>>     > 
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mail.openvswitch.org_mailman_listinfo_ovs-2Ddev&d=DwIFaQ&c=uilaK90D4TOVoH58JNXRgQ&r=BVhFA09CGX7JQ5Ih-uZnsw&m=yugqtZ7cEvhndkLMeadOmLxKbGB-ACchJUijn0RMvgw&s=FCF3pi4o5SRXC7i_G7gTde-AR73L0CeKtclvdPylerk&e=
>>     
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> d...@openvswitch.org
> https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to