Ansis Atteka <[email protected]> writes: > On 31 August 2017 at 16:22, Aaron Conole <[email protected]> wrote: >> This series brings about a policy update to openvswitch allowing it to >> run on a RHEL / Fedora system, even as a non-root user, with selinux set >> to Enforcing. >> >> The first two patches make some changes to the way the selinux policy is >> built to have a macro-like effect, allowing the dpdk policy to be enabled >> or disabled based on the build. This is chosen instead of using an selinux >> boolean, because it is more transparent to the end user. >> >> All of this work was tested by passing traffic, including via a dpdk bridge. >> >> I'm hoping that this can be backported to the 2.8 branch (since it would be >> needed to make fedora 2.8 make sense), but if not, we can always do the >> manual >> backport >> > I already pushed your patches to master branch. However, before > back-porting them to 2.8 I think more testing is required. For > example:
Agreed. I addressed your concerns, and also found a really embarrassingly stupid mistake. I plan on continuing to test it anyway. I'll be making some beer this weekend so I should have some spare cycles to kick stuff off. Thanks for all your help, Ansis! -Aaron _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
