On 9/5/17, 2:01 AM, "Yuanhan Liu" <[email protected]> wrote:
On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 10:35:51PM +0000, Darrell Ball wrote:
>
>
> On 8/31/17, 3:13 AM, "Yuanhan Liu" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 07:28:01PM +0000, Darrell Ball wrote:
> >
> > [Finn]
> >
> > I think we should not further intermix the rxqs distributed to
different pmd's, other than initially configured, when setting up hw-offload.
If we make a round-robin distribution of the rxqs, a different pmd will most
likely receive the hw-offloaded packets - not the same pmd that ran the
slow-path originally creating the flow.
> >
> > It is usual to optimize caches etc. per pmd and that would not
work then. Maybe the further processing of the hw-offloaded packets does not
need these optimizations at the moment, however, IMHO I think we would be
better off using the first proposal above (use the same rxq as the one creating
the flow).
> >
> > [Darrell] Several ideas have some validity.
> > However, this sounds reasonable and simple and we
could revisit as needed.
> > What do you think Yuanhan ?
>
> Just want to make sure we are on the same page: do you mean the
original
> solution/workaround I mentioned in the cover letter: record the rxq at
> recv and pass it down to flow creation?
>
> If so, I'm okay with it.
>
> [Darrell]
> This is the relevant part from the cover letter:
>
> “One possible
> solution is to record the rxq and pass it down to the flow creation
> stage. It would be much better, but it's still far away from being
perfect.
> Because it might have changed the steering rules stealthily, which may
> break the default RSS setup by OVS-DPDK.”
>
> This is a reasonable first cut.
> However, the flows installed are masked flows but the associated packets
would ‘normally’ end up on multiple
> PMDs due to RSS, right ?
Why it's "multiple PMDs due to RSS"? Isn't RSS for distributing packets
to multiple RX queues inside the NIC?
[Darrell] I was referring to the general case of using the distribution across
queues to
distribute work to different PMDs.
--yliu
> But for HWOL, we specify ‘the queue’ to be the one we receive the first
packet from.
> This is what I was getting at b4. So, future workarounds would be
‘auto-splitting flows’ across queues, user specified flow->queue
> associations etc
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --yliu
>
>
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
