On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 05:22:59PM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote: > From: Finn Christensen <f...@napatech.com> > > AFAIK, most (if not all) NICs (including Mellanox and Intel) do not > support a pure MARK action. It's required to be used together with > some other actions, like QUEUE. > > To workaround it, retry with a queue action when first try failed. > > Moreover, some Intel's NIC (say XL710) needs the QUEUE action set > before the MARK action. > > Co-authored-by: Yuanhan Liu <y...@fridaylinux.org> > Signed-off-by: Finn Christensen <f...@napatech.com> > Signed-off-by: Yuanhan Liu <y...@fridaylinux.org>
This feels a bit like the tail wagging the dog. Is this the lowest level at which it makes sense to implement this logic? If so then I wonder if some sort of probing would be in order to avoid the cost of trying to add the flow twice to hardware where the queue is required. ... _______________________________________________ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
