I just check it from DPDK http://dpdk.org/doc/guides/nics/overview.html#id1 Not all the DPDK NIC support hw_strip_crc
At 2017-10-14 10:33:21, "wenxu" <[email protected]> wrote: Hi Sugesh, I agree with you ! If there is hw_strip_crc info in the rte_eth_dev_info, it can be configured dynamic. If all the DPDK NICs can support the hw_crc_strip, it can be enable default. Maybe this can be check by DPDK guys? At 2017-10-13 18:28:46, "Chandran, Sugesh" <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi Wenxu, >Thank you for the patch. >I had reviewed the patch and I have same comment as Zhenyu. > >As you said there are so many other configs. Its not a good practice to offer >configuration choices for some of them. >I don’t think user see any difference in performance/functionality either its >enabled/disabled. >My understanding is, this will let user to reconfigure the port again with >hw_strip_crc when they see a failure. >Instead of having an option for user. How about check the support first and >enable/disable accordingly. I think DPDK doesn’t provide this information in >its rte_eth_dev_info now. However its worth to check the possibility in DPDK >to report hw_crc_strip feature support with other flags. >It looks similar to how rx checksum offload is being handled in OVS-DPDK. > >Also if all the DPDK NICs can support the hw_crc_strip, it make sense to keep >it enable as a default choice. >What do you think? > > > > > >Regards >_Sugesh > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:ovs-dev- >> [email protected]] On Behalf Of wenxu >> Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2017 3:33 AM >> To: Gao Zhenyu <[email protected]> >> Cc: ovs dev <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] netdev-dpdk: New option 'hw_strip_crc' fields >> for DPDK interfaces >> >> Hi Zhenyu, >> >> >> I think add a option maybe better. >> >> >> 1. It keep unchange the action with default value is false 2. It can be try >> one >> more time but if there some other different config, there should be more >> times >> to try 3. For some user who want to enable this feature, it can be >> configurable >> >> >> >> >> 在 2017-10-09 21:13:12，"Gao Zhenyu" <[email protected]> 写道： >> >> Thanks for working on it. >> >> >> I want to know if we can have a patch to try one more time if we hit the >> hw_strip_crc error since we had introduce many options in ovs-dpdk now. (Just >> like function dpdk_eth_dev_queue_setup, it figures out queue number by >> retrying) >> >> >> Thanks >> Zhenyu Gao >> >> >> 2017-10-09 17:09 GMT+08:00 <[email protected]>: >> From: wenxu <[email protected]> >> >> Some vf driver like i40evf can't disable the hw_strip_crc, with err >> 'dpdk|ERR|i40evf_dev_configure(): VF can't disable HW CRC Strip' >> so hw_strip_crc feature should can be configurable >> >> Signed-off-by: wenxu <[email protected]> >> --- >> NEWS | 2 ++ >> lib/netdev-dpdk.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> vswitchd/vswitch.xml | 9 +++++++++ >> 3 files changed, 41 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS >> index a3c1a02..d913847 100644 >> --- a/NEWS >> +++ b/NEWS >> @@ -5,6 +5,8 @@ Post-v2.8.0 >> chassis "hostname" in addition to a chassis "name". >> - Linux kernel 4.13 >> * Add support for compiling OVS with the latest Linux 4.13 kernel >> + - DPDK: >> + * New option 'hw_strip_crc' fields for DPDK interfaces >> >> v2.8.0 - xx xxx xxxx >> --------------------- >> diff --git a/lib/netdev-dpdk.c b/lib/netdev-dpdk.c index c60f46f..23c2a72 >> 100644 >> --- a/lib/netdev-dpdk.c >> +++ b/lib/netdev-dpdk.c >> @@ -402,11 +402,15 @@ struct netdev_dpdk { >> int requested_n_rxq; >> int requested_rxq_size; >> int requested_txq_size; >> + bool requested_hw_strip_crc; >> >> /* Number of rx/tx descriptors for physical devices */ >> int rxq_size; >> int txq_size; >> >> + /*crc strip feature config*/ >> + bool hw_strip_crc; >> + >> /* Socket ID detected when vHost device is brought up */ >> int requested_socket_id; >> >> @@ -700,6 +704,7 @@ dpdk_eth_dev_queue_setup(struct netdev_dpdk *dev, >> int n_rxq, int n_txq) >> >> conf.rxmode.hw_ip_checksum = (dev->hw_ol_features & >> NETDEV_RX_CHECKSUM_OFFLOAD) != 0; >> + conf.rxmode.hw_strip_crc = dev->hw_strip_crc; >> /* A device may report more queues than it makes available (this has >> * been observed for Intel xl710, which reserves some of them for >> * SRIOV): rte_eth_*_queue_setup will fail if a queue is not @@ -914,6 >> +919,8 @@ common_construct(struct netdev *netdev, dpdk_port_t port_no, >> dev->requested_n_txq = NR_QUEUE; >> dev->requested_rxq_size = NIC_PORT_DEFAULT_RXQ_SIZE; >> dev->requested_txq_size = NIC_PORT_DEFAULT_TXQ_SIZE; >> + dev->requested_hw_strip_crc = false; >> + dev->hw_strip_crc = false; >> >> /* Initialize the flow control to NULL */ >> memset(&dev->fc_conf, 0, sizeof dev->fc_conf); @@ -1192,6 +1199,11 @@ >> netdev_dpdk_get_config(const struct netdev *netdev, struct smap *args) >> } else { >> smap_add(args, "rx_csum_offload", "false"); >> } >> + if (dev->hw_strip_crc) { >> + smap_add(args, "hw_strip_crc", "true"); >> + } else { >> + smap_add(args, "hw_strip_crc", "false"); >> + } >> } >> ovs_mutex_unlock(&dev->mutex); >> >> @@ -1255,6 +1267,19 @@ dpdk_set_rxq_config(struct netdev_dpdk *dev, >> const struct smap *args) } >> >> static void >> +dpdk_set_hw_strip_crc_config(struct netdev_dpdk *dev, const struct smap >> *args) >> + OVS_REQUIRES(dev->mutex) >> +{ >> + int new_hw_strip_crc; >> + >> + new_hw_strip_crc = smap_get_bool(args, "hw_strip_crc", false); >> + if (new_hw_strip_crc != dev->requested_hw_strip_crc) { >> + dev->requested_hw_strip_crc = new_hw_strip_crc; >> + netdev_request_reconfigure(&dev->up); >> + } >> +} >> + >> +static void >> dpdk_process_queue_size(struct netdev *netdev, const struct smap *args, >> const char *flag, int default_size, int *new_size) >> { @@ -1290,6 >> +1315,8 @@ netdev_dpdk_set_config(struct netdev *netdev, const struct smap >> *args, >> >> dpdk_set_rxq_config(dev, args); >> >> + dpdk_set_hw_strip_crc_config(dev, args); >> + >> dpdk_process_queue_size(netdev, args, "n_rxq_desc", >> NIC_PORT_DEFAULT_RXQ_SIZE, >> &dev->requested_rxq_size); @@ -3196,6 +3223,7 @@ >> netdev_dpdk_reconfigure(struct netdev *netdev) >> if (netdev->n_txq == dev->requested_n_txq >> && netdev->n_rxq == dev->requested_n_rxq >> && dev->mtu == dev->requested_mtu >> + && dev->hw_strip_crc == dev->requested_hw_strip_crc >> && dev->rxq_size == dev->requested_rxq_size >> && dev->txq_size == dev->requested_txq_size >> && dev->socket_id == dev->requested_socket_id) { @@ -3217,6 +3245,8 >> @@ netdev_dpdk_reconfigure(struct netdev *netdev) >> dev->rxq_size = dev->requested_rxq_size; >> dev->txq_size = dev->requested_txq_size; >> >> + dev->hw_strip_crc = dev->requested_hw_strip_crc; >> + >> rte_free(dev->tx_q); >> err = dpdk_eth_dev_init(dev); >> dev->tx_q = netdev_dpdk_alloc_txq(netdev->n_txq); >> diff --git a/vswitchd/vswitch.xml b/vswitchd/vswitch.xml index >> 074535b..d1e7a6b 100644 >> --- a/vswitchd/vswitch.xml >> +++ b/vswitchd/vswitch.xml >> @@ -2589,6 +2589,15 @@ >> </p> >> </column> >> >> + <column name="options" key="hw_strip_crc" >> + type='{"type": "bool"}'> >> + <p> >> + Specifies DPDK interfaces whether enable hw_strip_crc feature or >> not. >> + If not specified, the default is false. >> + Not supported by DPDK vHost interfaces. >> + </p> >> + </column> >> + >> <column name="other_config" key="pmd-rxq-affinity"> >> <p>Specifies mapping of RX queues of this interface to CPU >> cores.</p> >> <p>Value should be set in the following form:</p> >> -- >> 1.8.3.1 >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev >> >> _______________________________________________ >> dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev >_______________________________________________ >dev mailing list >[email protected] >https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev 【网易自营】好吃到爆！鲜香弹滑加热即食，经典13香/麻辣小龙虾仅75元3斤>> _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
