> That's a good point, I don't have experience with that (what's the best DSCP > class), but we should make sure BFD packet, as control/monitoring traffic, is > prioritised over other types of traffic.
As indicated by Pradeep, CS6 is a good value, and I've seen that in various locations. > > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Venkatesan Pradeep < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Ben, > > > > The implementations I've worked on have used tos=0xC0 (DSCP CS6). > > Given that DSCP CS6 is recommended for network control traffic, and is > > used by OSPF, BGP etc., I think it is likely that many implementations > > do that for BFD too. Since BFD flaps have significant impact, marking > > BFD packets with the right DSCP value will allow the network to apply > > the right QoS for those packets and prevent BFD flaps due to network > congestion. > > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
