On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 03:47:35PM -0400, Aaron Conole wrote: > Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> writes: > > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 12:39:10AM -0700, Gurucharan Shetty wrote: > >> Signed-off-by: Gurucharan Shetty <[email protected]> > >> --- > >> Documentation/intro/install/rhel.rst | 2 +- > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/Documentation/intro/install/rhel.rst > >> b/Documentation/intro/install/rhel.rst > >> index 86c5cf3..aff6ccf 100644 > >> --- a/Documentation/intro/install/rhel.rst > >> +++ b/Documentation/intro/install/rhel.rst > >> @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ the below command:: > >> > >> $ yum install gcc make python-devel openssl-devel kernel-devel > >> graphviz \ > >> kernel-debug-devel autoconf automake rpm-build redhat-rpm-config \ > >> - libtool checkpolicy selinux-policy-devel > >> + libtool checkpolicy selinux-policy-devel python-sphinx > > > > For Debian, we just recommend installing the build-dependencies listed > > in debian/control. That has the advantage that it can't get out of > > date. It has the disadvantage, though, that it's not easy to cut and > > paste (although "apt-get build-dep openvswitch" usually does the trick). > > Maybe "yum" has some mode that installs dependencies from a spec file? > > For 'yum' distributions: > > yum-builddep > > For 'dnf' distributions (newer Fedora, and future RHEL versions): > > dnf builddep
Would it be reasonable to change rhel.rst to recommend using one of those tools, to ease future maintenance? _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
