On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 10:54 AM Aaron Conole <[email protected]> wrote:
> Timothy Redaelli <[email protected]> writes: > > > Without this commit is not possible to upgrade an openvswitch release > > that includes the commit ac416a3ab2d2 (for example 2.8.0) with another > release > > that includes the commit ac416a3ab2d2 (for example master or 2.8.1), > because > > rpm changes the user/group of /etc/openvswitch to root/root, but > ovsdb-server > > starts with the user openvswitch and so it doesn't have permissions to > write in > > /etc/openvswitch/conf.db. > > > > This patch tell rpm to use the openvswitch user and group for > > /etc/openvswitch and /etc/openvswitch/default.conf. > > > > Reported-by: Mark Michelson <[email protected]> > > CC: aaron conole <[email protected]> > > Fixes: ac416a3ab2d2 ("redhat: dynamically allocate and reference ovs > user") > > Signed-off-by: Timothy Redaelli <[email protected]> > > --- > > Ugh. I guess this is only a problem if you install ovs 2.8, and then > upgrade before creating the database? > > Regardless > > Acked-by: Aaron Conole <[email protected]> > Nope, in my case I was installing OVS 2.8.0, starting openvswitch, ovn-central, and ovn-controller services. I added information to the external_ids column of the open_vswitch table so that the ovn-controller could connect to the OVN southbound database. I ensured that ovn-sbctl reported the chassis as expected. Then I performed the upgrade. After upgrading the RPMs, /etc/openvswitch's ownership had changed from openvswitch:openvswitch to root:root. Attempting to restart the ovs-vswitchd service at this point failed. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
