On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 9:23 AM, Ashish Varma <ashishvarma....@gmail.com> wrote:
> added a unit test case for testing the condition when a tap interface
> is added to br0 and then the tap interface is deleted from the
> system and added back with the same name.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ashish Varma <ashishvarma....@gmail.com>

Thanks for working on this patch.

> diff --git a/tests/automake.mk b/tests/automake.mk
> index 7eed106..8c5f1b9 100644
> --- a/tests/automake.mk
> +++ b/tests/automake.mk
> @@ -118,7 +118,8 @@ SYSTEM_TESTSUITE_AT = \
>         tests/system-common-macros.at \
>         tests/system-ovn.at \
>         tests/system-layer3-tunnels.at \
> -       tests/system-traffic.at
> +       tests/system-traffic.at \
> +    tests/system-interface.at
^^^^^^^ Seems like we usually do not expand a tab into space in the automake.mk


> diff --git a/tests/system-interface.at b/tests/system-interface.at
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..a71e2aa
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/system-interface.at
> @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
> +AT_BANNER([system-inteface])
> +
> +dnl add a tap interface to br0, then delete and re-create
> +dnl the tap interface with the same name in the system
> +AT_SETUP([interface - add delete add same interface])
When I run make check-kmod against this test, I may intermittently
having the following errors. Are they expected?

+2017-12-08T01:03:31.065Z|00026|ofproto|WARN|br0: cannot get STP
status on nonexistent port 1
+2017-12-08T01:03:31.065Z|00027|ofproto|WARN|br0: cannot get RSTP
status on nonexistent port 1
+2017-12-08T01:03:31.071Z|00028|netdev_linux|WARN|ethtool command
ETHTOOL_GDRVINFO on network device ovs-tap0 failed: No such device
+2017-12-08T01:03:31.074Z|00029|netdev_linux|WARN|ethtool command
ETHTOOL_GSET on network device ovs-tap0 failed: No such device


> diff --git a/tests/system-kmod-testsuite.at b/tests/system-kmod-testsuite.at
> index 975b200..bda314a 100644
> --- a/tests/system-kmod-testsuite.at
> +++ b/tests/system-kmod-testsuite.at
> @@ -25,3 +25,4 @@ m4_include([tests/system-kmod-macros.at])
>  m4_include([tests/system-traffic.at])
>  m4_include([tests/system-layer3-tunnels.at])
>  m4_include([tests/system-ovn.at])
> +m4_include([tests/system-interface.at])
> --
Should we add this test to system-userspace as well?

Something like,

==================================================================

diff --git a/tests/system-userspace-testsuite.at
b/tests/system-userspace-testsuite.at
index a89536f1d381..c0aaa606d05d 100644
--- a/tests/system-userspace-testsuite.at
+++ b/tests/system-userspace-testsuite.at
@@ -25,4 +25,5 @@ m4_include([tests/system-common-macros.at])
 m4_include([tests/system-traffic.at])
 m4_include([tests/system-layer3-tunnels.at])
 m4_include([tests/system-ovn.at])
+m4_include([tests/system-interface.at])
 m4_include([tests/system-userspace-packet-type-aware.at])

==================================================================


Thanks,

-Yi-Hung
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to