> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin Traynor [mailto:ktray...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2018 10:35 AM
> To: Stokes, Ian <ian.sto...@intel.com>; d...@openvswitch.org
> Cc: antonio.fische...@gmail.com; Ilya Maximets <i.maxim...@samsung.com>;
> Jan Scheurich <jan.scheur...@ericsson.com>
> Subject: Re: [RFC Patch v1] netdev-dpdk: Reintroduce shared mempools.
> 
> On 02/13/2018 09:07 AM, Stokes, Ian wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Just pinging for feedback for this patch. If we are to include this for
> branch 2.9 as a bug fix I think we need feedback quite soon.
> >
> > Have people had time to validate and review?
> >
> 
> Hi Ian,
> 
> As per the other thread I have reviewed and tested multiple ports with MTU
> reconfigs - creating new mempools, freeing unused mempools, ports sharing
> mempools, ports having separate mempools, numa based reconfig from vhost
> etc. All working fine, so LGTM.

Thanks for reviewing and validating.

> 
> Are you going to send a non-rfc version of this patch?

I've submitted a non rfc patch now, if you can respond with tested-by tags 
there that would be great.

https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-dev/2018-February/344398.html

Thanks
Ian

> 
> thanks,
> Kevin.
> 
> > Thanks
> > Ian
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Stokes, Ian
> >> Sent: Thursday, February 8, 2018 11:39 AM
> >> To: d...@openvswitch.org
> >> Cc: Stokes, Ian <ian.sto...@intel.com>; antonio.fische...@gmail.com;
> >> Ilya Maximets <i.maxim...@samsung.com>; Kevin Traynor
> >> <ktray...@redhat.com>; Jan Scheurich <jan.scheur...@ericsson.com>
> >> Subject: [RFC Patch v1] netdev-dpdk: Reintroduce shared mempools.
> >>
> >> This commit manually reverts the current per port mempool model to
> >> the previous shared mempool model for DPDK ports.
> >>
> >> OVS previously used a shared mempool model for ports with the same
> >> MTU configuration. This was replaced by a per port mempool model to
> >> address issues flagged by users such as:
> >>
> >> https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-discuss/2016-
> >> September/042560.html
> >>
> >> However the per port model has a number of issues including:
> >>
> >> 1. Requires an increase in memory resource requirements to support
> >> the same number of ports as the shared port model.
> >> 2. Incorrect algorithm for mbuf provisioning for each mempool.
> >>
> >> These are considered blocking factors for current deployments of OVS
> >> when upgrading to OVS 2.9 as a memory redimensioning will be
> >> required. This may not be possible for users.
> >>
> >> For clarity, the commits whose changes are removed include the
> >> following:
> >>
> >> netdev-dpdk: Create separate memory pool for each port: d555d9b
> >> netdev-dpdk: fix management of pre-existing mempools: b6b26021d Fix
> >> mempool names to reflect socket id: f06546a
> >> netdev-dpdk: skip init for existing mempools: 837c176
> >> netdev-dpdk: manage failure in mempool name creation: 65056fd
> >> netdev-dpdk: Reword mp_size as n_mbufs: ad9b5b9
> >> netdev-dpdk: Rename dpdk_mp_put as dpdk_mp_free: a08a115
> >> netdev-dpdk: Fix mp_name leak on snprintf failure: ec6edc8
> >> netdev-dpdk: Fix dpdk_mp leak in case of EEXIST: 173ef76
> >> netdev-dpdk: Factor out struct dpdk_mp: 24e78f9
> >> netdev-dpdk: Remove unused MAX_NB_MBUF: bc57ed9
> >> netdev-dpdk: Fix mempool creation with large MTU: af5b0da
> >>
> >> Due to the number of commits and period of time they were introduced
> >> over, a simple revert was not possible. All code from the commits
> >> above is removed and the shared mempool code reintroduced as it was
> >> before its replacement.
> >>
> >> Code introduced by commit
> >>
> >> netdev-dpdk: Add debug appctl to get mempool information: be48173
> >>
> >> has been modified to work with the shared mempool model.
> >>
> >> Cc: antonio.fische...@gmail.com
> >> Cc: Ilya Maximets <i.maxim...@samsung.com>
> >> Cc: Kevin Traynor <ktray...@redhat.com>
> >> Cc: Jan Scheurich <jan.scheur...@ericsson.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Ian Stokes <ian.sto...@intel.com>
> >> ---
> >>  lib/netdev-dpdk.c | 246
> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> >> -----
> >>  1 file changed, 138 insertions(+), 108 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/lib/netdev-dpdk.c b/lib/netdev-dpdk.c index
> >> 94fb163..6f3378b
> >> 100644
> >> --- a/lib/netdev-dpdk.c
> >> +++ b/lib/netdev-dpdk.c
> >> @@ -91,13 +91,24 @@ static struct vlog_rate_limit rl =
> >> VLOG_RATE_LIMIT_INIT(5, 20);
> >>  #define NETDEV_DPDK_MBUF_ALIGN      1024
> >>  #define NETDEV_DPDK_MAX_PKT_LEN     9728
> >>
> >> -/* Min number of packets in the mempool.  OVS tries to allocate a
> >> mempool with
> >> - * roughly estimated number of mbufs: if this fails (because the
> >> system doesn't
> >> - * have enough hugepages) we keep halving the number until the
> >> allocation
> >> - * succeeds or we reach MIN_NB_MBUF */
> >> +/* Max and min number of packets in the mempool.  OVS tries to
> >> +allocate a
> >> + * mempool with MAX_NB_MBUF: if this fails (because the system
> >> +doesn't have
> >> + * enough hugepages) we keep halving the number until the allocation
> >> +succeeds
> >> + * or we reach MIN_NB_MBUF */
> >> +
> >> +#define MAX_NB_MBUF          (4096 * 64)
> >>  #define MIN_NB_MBUF          (4096 * 4)
> >>  #define MP_CACHE_SZ          RTE_MEMPOOL_CACHE_MAX_SIZE
> >>
> >> +/* MAX_NB_MBUF can be divided by 2 many times, until MIN_NB_MBUF */
> >> +BUILD_ASSERT_DECL(MAX_NB_MBUF % ROUND_DOWN_POW2(MAX_NB_MBUF /
> >> MIN_NB_MBUF)
> >> +                  == 0);
> >> +
> >> +/* The smallest possible NB_MBUF that we're going to try should be a
> >> +multiple
> >> + * of MP_CACHE_SZ. This is advised by DPDK documentation. */
> >> +BUILD_ASSERT_DECL((MAX_NB_MBUF / ROUND_DOWN_POW2(MAX_NB_MBUF /
> >> MIN_NB_MBUF))
> >> +                  % MP_CACHE_SZ == 0);
> >> +
> >>  /*
> >>   * DPDK XSTATS Counter names definition
> >>   */
> >> @@ -295,6 +306,19 @@ static struct ovs_list dpdk_list
> >> OVS_GUARDED_BY(dpdk_mutex)  static struct ovs_mutex dpdk_mp_mutex
> >> OVS_ACQ_AFTER(dpdk_mutex)
> >>      = OVS_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
> >>
> >> +static struct ovs_list dpdk_mp_list OVS_GUARDED_BY(dpdk_mp_mutex)
> >> +    = OVS_LIST_INITIALIZER(&dpdk_mp_list);
> >> +
> >> +
> >> +struct dpdk_mp {
> >> +     struct rte_mempool *mp;
> >> +     int mtu;
> >> +     int socket_id;
> >> +     int refcount;
> >> +     struct ovs_list list_node OVS_GUARDED_BY(dpdk_mp_mutex);  };
> >> +
> >> +
> >>  /* There should be one 'struct dpdk_tx_queue' created for
> >>   * each cpu core. */
> >>  struct dpdk_tx_queue {
> >> @@ -371,7 +395,7 @@ struct netdev_dpdk {
> >>
> >>      PADDED_MEMBERS_CACHELINE_MARKER(CACHE_LINE_SIZE, cacheline1,
> >>          struct ovs_mutex mutex OVS_ACQ_AFTER(dpdk_mutex);
> >> -        struct rte_mempool *mp;
> >> +        struct dpdk_mp *dpdk_mp;
> >>
> >>          /* virtio identifier for vhost devices */
> >>          ovsrcu_index vid;
> >> @@ -510,133 +534,132 @@ ovs_rte_pktmbuf_init(struct rte_mempool *mp
> >> OVS_UNUSED,
> >>      dp_packet_init_dpdk((struct dp_packet *) pkt, pkt->buf_len);  }
> >>
> >> -/* Returns a valid pointer when either of the following is true:
> >> - *  - a new mempool was just created;
> >> - *  - a matching mempool already exists. */ -static struct
> >> rte_mempool * -dpdk_mp_create(struct netdev_dpdk *dev, int mtu) -{
> >> -    char mp_name[RTE_MEMPOOL_NAMESIZE];
> >> -    const char *netdev_name = netdev_get_name(&dev->up);
> >> -    int socket_id = dev->requested_socket_id;
> >> -    uint32_t n_mbufs;
> >> -    uint32_t hash = hash_string(netdev_name, 0);
> >> -    struct rte_mempool *mp = NULL;
> >> -
> >> -    /*
> >> -     * XXX: rough estimation of number of mbufs required for this
> port:
> >> -     * <packets required to fill the device rxqs>
> >> -     * + <packets that could be stuck on other ports txqs>
> >> -     * + <packets in the pmd threads>
> >> -     * + <additional memory for corner cases>
> >> +static struct dpdk_mp *
> >> +dpdk_mp_create(int socket_id, int mtu) {
> >> +    struct dpdk_mp *dmp;
> >> +    unsigned mp_size;
> >> +    char *mp_name;
> >> +
> >> +    dmp = dpdk_rte_mzalloc(sizeof *dmp);
> >> +    if (!dmp) {
> >> +        return NULL;
> >> +    }
> >> +    dmp->socket_id = socket_id;
> >> +    dmp->mtu = mtu;
> >> +    dmp->refcount = 1;
> >> +    /* XXX: this is a really rough method of provisioning memory.
> >> +     * It's impossible to determine what the exact memory
> >> + requirements
> >> are
> >> +     * when the number of ports and rxqs that utilize a particular
> >> mempool can
> >> +     * change dynamically at runtime. For now, use this rough
> heurisitic.
> >>       */
> >> -    n_mbufs = dev->requested_n_rxq * dev->requested_rxq_size
> >> -              + dev->requested_n_txq * dev->requested_txq_size
> >> -              + MIN(RTE_MAX_LCORE, dev->requested_n_rxq) *
> >> NETDEV_MAX_BURST
> >> -              + MIN_NB_MBUF;
> >> +    if (mtu >= ETHER_MTU) {
> >> +        mp_size = MAX_NB_MBUF;
> >> +    } else {
> >> +        mp_size = MIN_NB_MBUF;
> >> +    }
> >>
> >> -    ovs_mutex_lock(&dpdk_mp_mutex);
> >>      do {
> >> -        /* Full DPDK memory pool name must be unique and cannot be
> >> -         * longer than RTE_MEMPOOL_NAMESIZE. */
> >> -        int ret = snprintf(mp_name, RTE_MEMPOOL_NAMESIZE,
> >> -                           "ovs%08x%02d%05d%07u",
> >> -                           hash, socket_id, mtu, n_mbufs);
> >> -        if (ret < 0 || ret >= RTE_MEMPOOL_NAMESIZE) {
> >> -            VLOG_DBG("snprintf returned %d. "
> >> -                     "Failed to generate a mempool name for \"%s\". "
> >> -                     "Hash:0x%x, socket_id: %d, mtu:%d, mbufs:%u.",
> >> -                     ret, netdev_name, hash, socket_id, mtu, n_mbufs);
> >> -            break;
> >> +        mp_name = xasprintf("ovs_mp_%d_%d_%u", dmp->mtu, dmp-
> >socket_id,
> >> +                            mp_size);
> >> +
> >> +        dmp->mp = rte_pktmbuf_pool_create(mp_name, mp_size,
> >> +                                          MP_CACHE_SZ,
> >> +                                          sizeof (struct dp_packet)
> >> +                                          - sizeof (struct rte_mbuf),
> >> +                                          MBUF_SIZE(mtu)
> >> +                                          - sizeof(struct dp_packet),
> >> +                                          socket_id);
> >> +        if (dmp->mp) {
> >> +            VLOG_DBG("Allocated \"%s\" mempool with %u mbufs",
> >> +                     mp_name, mp_size);
> >>          }
> >> +        free(mp_name);
> >> +        if (dmp->mp) {
> >> +            /* rte_pktmbuf_pool_create has done some initialization
> >> + of
> >> the
> >> +             * rte_mbuf part of each dp_packet, while
> >> ovs_rte_pktmbuf_init
> >> +             * initializes some OVS specific fields of dp_packet.
> >> +             */
> >> +            rte_mempool_obj_iter(dmp->mp, ovs_rte_pktmbuf_init, NULL);
> >> +            return dmp;
> >> +        }
> >> +    } while (rte_errno == ENOMEM && (mp_size /= 2) >= MIN_NB_MBUF);
> >>
> >> -        VLOG_DBG("Port %s: Requesting a mempool of %u mbufs "
> >> -                  "on socket %d for %d Rx and %d Tx queues.",
> >> -                  netdev_name, n_mbufs, socket_id,
> >> -                  dev->requested_n_rxq, dev->requested_n_txq);
> >> +    rte_free(dmp);
> >> +    return NULL;
> >> +}
> >>
> >> -        mp = rte_pktmbuf_pool_create(mp_name, n_mbufs, MP_CACHE_SZ,
> >> -                 sizeof (struct dp_packet) - sizeof (struct rte_mbuf),
> >> -                 MBUF_SIZE(mtu) - sizeof(struct dp_packet),
> socket_id);
> >> +static struct dpdk_mp *
> >> +dpdk_mp_get(int socket_id, int mtu)
> >> +{
> >> +    struct dpdk_mp *dmp;
> >>
> >> -        if (mp) {
> >> -            VLOG_DBG("Allocated \"%s\" mempool with %u mbufs",
> >> -                     mp_name, n_mbufs);
> >> -            /* rte_pktmbuf_pool_create has done some initialization of
> >> the
> >> -             * rte_mbuf part of each dp_packet. Some OvS specific
> fields
> >> -             * of the packet still need to be initialized by
> >> -             * ovs_rte_pktmbuf_init. */
> >> -            rte_mempool_obj_iter(mp, ovs_rte_pktmbuf_init, NULL);
> >> -        } else if (rte_errno == EEXIST) {
> >> -            /* A mempool with the same name already exists.  We just
> >> -             * retrieve its pointer to be returned to the caller. */
> >> -            mp = rte_mempool_lookup(mp_name);
> >> -            /* As the mempool create returned EEXIST we can expect the
> >> -             * lookup has returned a valid pointer.  If for some
> reason
> >> -             * that's not the case we keep track of it. */
> >> -            VLOG_DBG("A mempool with name \"%s\" already exists at
> %p.",
> >> -                     mp_name, mp);
> >> -        } else {
> >> -            VLOG_ERR("Failed mempool \"%s\" create request of %u
> mbufs",
> >> -                     mp_name, n_mbufs);
> >> +    ovs_mutex_lock(&dpdk_mp_mutex);
> >> +    LIST_FOR_EACH (dmp, list_node, &dpdk_mp_list) {
> >> +        if (dmp->socket_id == socket_id && dmp->mtu == mtu) {
> >> +            dmp->refcount++;
> >> +            goto out;
> >>          }
> >> -    } while (!mp && rte_errno == ENOMEM && (n_mbufs /= 2) >=
> >> MIN_NB_MBUF);
> >> +    }
> >> +
> >> +    dmp = dpdk_mp_create(socket_id, mtu);
> >> +    if (dmp) {
> >> +        ovs_list_push_back(&dpdk_mp_list, &dmp->list_node);
> >> +    }
> >> +
> >> +out:
> >>
> >>      ovs_mutex_unlock(&dpdk_mp_mutex);
> >> -    return mp;
> >> +
> >> +    return dmp;
> >>  }
> >>
> >>  /* Release an existing mempool. */
> >>  static void
> >> -dpdk_mp_free(struct rte_mempool *mp)
> >> +dpdk_mp_put(struct dpdk_mp *dmp)
> >>  {
> >> -    if (!mp) {
> >> +    if (!dmp) {
> >>          return;
> >>      }
> >>
> >>      ovs_mutex_lock(&dpdk_mp_mutex);
> >> -    VLOG_DBG("Releasing \"%s\" mempool", mp->name);
> >> -    rte_mempool_free(mp);
> >> +    ovs_assert(dmp->refcount);
> >> +
> >> +    if (! --dmp->refcount) {
> >> +        ovs_list_remove(&dmp->list_node);
> >> +        rte_mempool_free(dmp->mp);
> >> +        rte_free(dmp);
> >> +     }
> >>      ovs_mutex_unlock(&dpdk_mp_mutex);  }
> >>
> >> -/* Tries to allocate a new mempool - or re-use an existing one where
> >> - * appropriate - on requested_socket_id with a size determined by
> >> - * requested_mtu and requested Rx/Tx queues.
> >> - * On success - or when re-using an existing mempool - the new
> >> configuration
> >> - * will be applied.
> >> +/* Tries to allocate new mempool on requested_socket_id with
> >> + * mbuf size corresponding to requested_mtu.
> >> + * On success new configuration will be applied.
> >>   * On error, device will be left unchanged. */  static int
> >> netdev_dpdk_mempool_configure(struct netdev_dpdk *dev)
> >>      OVS_REQUIRES(dev->mutex)
> >>  {
> >>      uint32_t buf_size = dpdk_buf_size(dev->requested_mtu);
> >> -    struct rte_mempool *mp;
> >> -    int ret = 0;
> >> +    struct dpdk_mp *mp;
> >>
> >> -    mp = dpdk_mp_create(dev, FRAME_LEN_TO_MTU(buf_size));
> >> +    mp = dpdk_mp_get(dev->requested_socket_id,
> >> + FRAME_LEN_TO_MTU(buf_size));
> >>      if (!mp) {
> >>          VLOG_ERR("Failed to create memory pool for netdev "
> >>                   "%s, with MTU %d on socket %d: %s\n",
> >>                   dev->up.name, dev->requested_mtu, dev-
> >>> requested_socket_id,
> >> -                 rte_strerror(rte_errno));
> >> -        ret = rte_errno;
> >> +        rte_strerror(rte_errno));
> >> +        return rte_errno;
> >>      } else {
> >> -        /* If a new MTU was requested and its rounded value equals the
> >> one
> >> -         * that is currently used, then the existing mempool is
> returned.
> >> */
> >> -        if (dev->mp != mp) {
> >> -            /* A new mempool was created, release the previous one. */
> >> -            dpdk_mp_free(dev->mp);
> >> -        } else {
> >> -            ret = EEXIST;
> >> -        }
> >> -        dev->mp = mp;
> >> +        dpdk_mp_put(dev->dpdk_mp);
> >> +        dev->dpdk_mp = mp;
> >>          dev->mtu = dev->requested_mtu;
> >>          dev->socket_id = dev->requested_socket_id;
> >>          dev->max_packet_len = MTU_TO_FRAME_LEN(dev->mtu);
> >>      }
> >>
> >> -    return ret;
> >> +    return 0;
> >>  }
> >>
> >>  static void
> >> @@ -742,7 +765,8 @@ dpdk_eth_dev_queue_setup(struct netdev_dpdk *dev,
> >> int n_rxq, int n_txq)
> >>
> >>          for (i = 0; i < n_rxq; i++) {
> >>              diag = rte_eth_rx_queue_setup(dev->port_id, i, dev-
> >rxq_size,
> >> -                                          dev->socket_id, NULL, dev-
> >mp);
> >> +                                          dev->socket_id, NULL,
> >> +                                          dev->dpdk_mp->mp);
> >>              if (diag) {
> >>                  VLOG_INFO("Interface %s rxq(%d) setup error: %s",
> >>                            dev->up.name, i, rte_strerror(-diag)); @@
> >> -
> >> 826,7 +850,7 @@ dpdk_eth_dev_init(struct netdev_dpdk *dev)
> >>      memcpy(dev->hwaddr.ea, eth_addr.addr_bytes, ETH_ADDR_LEN);
> >>      rte_eth_link_get_nowait(dev->port_id, &dev->link);
> >>
> >> -    mbp_priv = rte_mempool_get_priv(dev->mp);
> >> +    mbp_priv = rte_mempool_get_priv(dev->dpdk_mp->mp);
> >>      dev->buf_size = mbp_priv->mbuf_data_room_size -
> >> RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM;
> >>
> >>      /* Get the Flow control configuration for DPDK-ETH */ @@ -1079,7
> >> +1103,7 @@ common_destruct(struct netdev_dpdk *dev)
> >>      OVS_EXCLUDED(dev->mutex)
> >>  {
> >>      rte_free(dev->tx_q);
> >> -    dpdk_mp_free(dev->mp);
> >> +    dpdk_mp_put(dev->dpdk_mp);
> >>
> >>      ovs_list_remove(&dev->list_node);
> >>      free(ovsrcu_get_protected(struct ingress_policer *, @@ -1823,7
> >> +1847,7 @@ netdev_dpdk_vhost_rxq_recv(struct netdev_rxq *rxq,
> >>      }
> >>
> >>      nb_rx = rte_vhost_dequeue_burst(vid, qid * VIRTIO_QNUM +
> VIRTIO_TXQ,
> >> -                                    dev->mp,
> >> +                                    dev->dpdk_mp->mp,
> >>                                      (struct rte_mbuf **) batch-
> >packets,
> >>                                      NETDEV_MAX_BURST);
> >>      if (!nb_rx) {
> >> @@ -2043,7 +2067,7 @@ dpdk_do_tx_copy(struct netdev *netdev, int qid,
> >> struct dp_packet_batch *batch)
> >>              continue;
> >>          }
> >>
> >> -        pkts[txcnt] = rte_pktmbuf_alloc(dev->mp);
> >> +        pkts[txcnt] = rte_pktmbuf_alloc(dev->dpdk_mp->mp);
> >>          if (OVS_UNLIKELY(!pkts[txcnt])) {
> >>              dropped += cnt - i;
> >>              break;
> >> @@ -2919,7 +2943,7 @@ netdev_dpdk_get_mempool_info(struct
> >> unixctl_conn *conn,
> >>          ovs_mutex_lock(&dev->mutex);
> >>          ovs_mutex_lock(&dpdk_mp_mutex);
> >>
> >> -        rte_mempool_dump(stream, dev->mp);
> >> +        rte_mempool_dump(stream, dev->dpdk_mp->mp);
> >>
> >>          ovs_mutex_unlock(&dpdk_mp_mutex);
> >>          ovs_mutex_unlock(&dev->mutex); @@ -3556,9 +3580,12 @@
> >> netdev_dpdk_reconfigure(struct netdev *netdev)
> >>
> >>      rte_eth_dev_stop(dev->port_id);
> >>
> >> -    err = netdev_dpdk_mempool_configure(dev);
> >> -    if (err && err != EEXIST) {
> >> -        goto out;
> >> +    if (dev->mtu != dev->requested_mtu
> >> +        || dev->socket_id != dev->requested_socket_id) {
> >> +        err = netdev_dpdk_mempool_configure(dev);
> >> +        if (err) {
> >> +            goto out;
> >> +        }
> >>      }
> >>
> >>      netdev->n_txq = dev->requested_n_txq; @@ -3596,13 +3623,16 @@
> >> dpdk_vhost_reconfigure_helper(struct netdev_dpdk *dev)
> >>
> >>      netdev_dpdk_remap_txqs(dev);
> >>
> >> -    err = netdev_dpdk_mempool_configure(dev);
> >> -    if (!err) {
> >> -        /* A new mempool was created. */
> >> -        netdev_change_seq_changed(&dev->up);
> >> -    } else if (err != EEXIST){
> >> -        return err;
> >> +    if (dev->requested_socket_id != dev->socket_id
> >> +        || dev->requested_mtu != dev->mtu) {
> >> +        err = netdev_dpdk_mempool_configure(dev);
> >> +        if (err) {
> >> +            return err;
> >> +        } else {
> >> +            netdev_change_seq_changed(&dev->up);
> >> +        }
> >>      }
> >> +
> >>      if (netdev_dpdk_get_vid(dev) >= 0) {
> >>          if (dev->vhost_reconfigured == false) {
> >>              dev->vhost_reconfigured = true;
> >> --
> >> 2.7.5
> >

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to