On 3/4/18, 6:55 PM, "Yang, Yi" <yi.y.y...@intel.com> wrote: GTP-C is for control path, so I don't think it makes sense for OVS to handle this, in addition GTP-C used different UDP port from GTP-U's, so we must have different tunnel ports to handle them respectively. I don't know if Jiannan has implemented GTP-C support in kernel data path, we can add GTP-C support if it is really needed, but I think it is a nice-to-have thing.
No, I didn’t implement GTP-C neither. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
