On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 04:14:58PM -0700, Yi-Hung Wei wrote: > On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 3:27 PM, Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 11:16:41AM -0700, Yi-Hung Wei wrote: > >> With commit f6fabcc6 ("ofproto-dpif: Mark packets as "untracked" after > >> call to ct()", after the ct() action, the packet conntrack state is set > >> to an untracked state, and all the conntrack fields are cleared. > >> This patch updates ofproto/trace report to reflect this change, so that > >> it would be easier to debug OpenFlow pipeline with conntrack. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Yi-Hung Wei <yihung....@gmail.com> > > > > Would you mind showing an example to provide context? > > > > Hi Ben, > > Here is a simplified version of what I was debugging using ofproto/trace. > > > table=0, in_port=1, tcp, action=ct(table=1) > > table=1, tcp, action=resubmit(,2), resubmit(,3) > > table=2, ct_state=+trk+new, action=ct(commit) > > table=3, ct_state=+trk+new, action=output:2 > table=3, ct_state=-trk, action=drop > > > Basically, the controller is expecting the ct_sate to be +trk+new in > table 3, however, it is clear in the first resubmit in table 2 (after > ovs 2.9). Therefore, mentioning that in the ofproto/trace report > would be helpful to know that the conntrack fields are actually > cleared.
Thanks. I applied this to master. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev