Did you find anyone to take a look?
On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 07:29:06PM +0000, Darrell Ball wrote: > Windows folks have also been looking at this, as this file is mostly a common > port from bsd. > I’ll check with Sai > > On 3/9/18, 11:22 AM, "[email protected] on behalf of Ben Pfaff" > <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 11:25:50PM -0800, Darrell Ball wrote: > > Fix tcp sequence tracking for session reuse cases. This can happen, > > for example by doing VM migration, where sequence tracking needs to > > be more permissive. The solution is to be more permissive for > > session restart and session start only. We don't differentiate > > session start here where we could be more strict, although we could, > > because the gain in protection is almost zero and the code modularity > > would be lessened and code complexity increased. > > This issue originates in release 2.7. > > > > Signed-off-by: Darrell Ball <[email protected]> > > Darrell, who should review this? Justin, are you the right person? > _______________________________________________ > dev mailing list > [email protected] > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mail.openvswitch.org_mailman_listinfo_ovs-2Ddev&d=DwICAg&c=uilaK90D4TOVoH58JNXRgQ&r=BVhFA09CGX7JQ5Ih-uZnsw&m=cwtm0y5t5FEfGZdPOmWiiE5ODS8BoNvdrbv6oFCZNEk&s=yHLhMPNWgZwAe36ObZ2obrSzPWqVbJZOg5ofA18IS_k&e= > > _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
