On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 9:57 PM, Mark Michelson <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Jakub,
>
> I finally got around to taking a look at this. I made up some imaginary
> expressions to try to see if I could find a way that this would break, but
> it looks good to me in each case.
>
> Acked-by: Mark Michelson <[email protected]>



Same here. I tested with all the combinations I could think of.

Acked-by: Numan Siddique <[email protected]>


>
>
> On 04/26/2018 03:54 PM, Jakub Sitnicki wrote:
>
>> Appending prerequisites to sub-expressions of OR that are all over one
>> symbol prevents the expression-to-matches converter from applying
>> conjunctive matching. This happens during the annotation phase.
>>
>> input:      s1 == { c1, c2 } && s2 == { c3, c4 }
>> expanded:   (s1 == c1 || s1 == c2) && (s2 == c3 || s2 == c4)
>> annotated:  ((p1 && s1 == c1) || (p1 && s1 == c2)) &&
>>              ((p2 && s2 == c3) || (p2 && s2 == c4))
>> normalized: (p1 && p2 && s1 == c1 && s2 == c3) ||
>>              (p1 && p2 && s1 == c1 && s2 == c4) ||
>>             (p1 && p2 && s1 == c2 && s2 == c3) ||
>>             (p1 && p2 && s1 == c2 && s2 == c4)
>>
>> Where s1,s2 - symbols, c1..c4 - constants, p1,p2 - prerequisites.
>>
>> Since sub-expressions of OR trees that are over one symbol all have the
>> same prerequisites, we can factor them out leaving the OR tree in tact,
>> and enabling the converter to apply conjunctive matching to
>> AND(OR(clause)) trees.
>>
>> Going back to our example this change gives us:
>>
>> input:      s1 == { c1, c2 } && s2 == { c3, c4 }
>> expanded:   (s1 == c1 || s1 == c2) && (s2 == c3 || s2 == c4)
>> annotated:  (s1 == c1 || s1 == c2) && p1 && (s2 == c3 || s2 == c4) && p2
>> normalized: p1 && p2 && (s1 == c1 || s1 == c2) && (s2 == c3 || s2 == c4)
>>
>> We also factor out the prerequisites out of pure AND or mixed AND/OR
>> trees to keep the common code path, but in this case we don't gain
>> anything.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jakub Sitnicki <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>
>> This is an alternative to "Enhance conjunctive match support in OVN"
>> patch from
>> Numan Siddique [1].
>>
>> [1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/874433/
>>
>>   ovn/lib/expr.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> +++++++++++++++----------
>>   tests/ovn.at   |  4 ++--
>>   2 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/ovn/lib/expr.c b/ovn/lib/expr.c
>> index 5840ef871..9dd8d6f17 100644
>> --- a/ovn/lib/expr.c
>> +++ b/ovn/lib/expr.c
>> @@ -32,6 +32,13 @@
>>
>>   VLOG_DEFINE_THIS_MODULE(expr);
>>
>> +static const struct expr_symbol *
>> +expr_get_unique_symbol(const struct expr *expr);
>> +
>> +struct expr *
>> +expr_annotate__(struct expr *expr, const struct shash *symtab,
>> +                bool append_prereqs, struct ovs_list *nesting, char
>> **errorp);
>> +
>>   static struct expr *parse_and_annotate(const char *s,
>>                                          const struct shash *symtab,
>>                                          struct ovs_list *nesting,
>> @@ -1658,9 +1665,6 @@ struct annotation_nesting {
>>       const struct expr_symbol *symbol;
>>   };
>>
>> -struct expr *expr_annotate__(struct expr *, const struct shash *symtab,
>> -                             struct ovs_list *nesting, char **errorp);
>> -
>>   static struct expr *
>>   parse_and_annotate(const char *s, const struct shash *symtab,
>>                      struct ovs_list *nesting, char **errorp)
>> @@ -1670,7 +1674,7 @@ parse_and_annotate(const char *s, const struct
>> shash *symtab,
>>
>>       expr = expr_parse_string(s, symtab, NULL, NULL, &error);
>>       if (expr) {
>> -        expr = expr_annotate__(expr, symtab, nesting, &error);
>> +        expr = expr_annotate__(expr, symtab, true, nesting, &error);
>>       }
>>       if (expr) {
>>           *errorp = NULL;
>> @@ -1685,7 +1689,7 @@ parse_and_annotate(const char *s, const struct
>> shash *symtab,
>>
>>   static struct expr *
>>   expr_annotate_cmp(struct expr *expr, const struct shash *symtab,
>> -                  struct ovs_list *nesting, char **errorp)
>> +                  bool append_prereqs, struct ovs_list *nesting, char
>> **errorp)
>>   {
>>       const struct expr_symbol *symbol = expr->cmp.symbol;
>>       const struct annotation_nesting *iter;
>> @@ -1703,7 +1707,7 @@ expr_annotate_cmp(struct expr *expr, const struct
>> shash *symtab,
>>       ovs_list_push_back(nesting, &an.node);
>>
>>       struct expr *prereqs = NULL;
>> -    if (symbol->prereqs) {
>> +    if (append_prereqs && symbol->prereqs) {
>>           prereqs = parse_and_annotate(symbol->prereqs, symtab, nesting,
>> errorp);
>>           if (!prereqs) {
>>               goto error;
>> @@ -1744,21 +1748,46 @@ expr_annotate_cmp(struct expr *expr, const struct
>> shash *symtab,
>>       return NULL;
>>   }
>>
>> +/* Append (logical AND) prereqs for given symbol to the expression. */
>> +static struct expr *
>> +expr_append_prereqs(struct expr *expr, const struct expr_symbol *symbol,
>> +                    const struct shash *symtab, struct ovs_list *nesting,
>> +                    char **errorp)
>> +{
>> +    struct expr *prereqs = NULL;
>> +
>> +    if (symbol->prereqs) {
>> +        prereqs = parse_and_annotate(symbol->prereqs, symtab, nesting,
>> errorp);
>> +        if (!prereqs) {
>> +            goto error;
>> +        }
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    return prereqs ? expr_combine(EXPR_T_AND, expr, prereqs) : expr;
>> +
>> +error:
>> +    expr_destroy(expr);
>> +    expr_destroy(prereqs);
>> +    return NULL;
>> +}
>> +
>>   struct expr *
>>   expr_annotate__(struct expr *expr, const struct shash *symtab,
>> -                struct ovs_list *nesting, char **errorp)
>> +                bool append_prereqs, struct ovs_list *nesting, char
>> **errorp)
>>   {
>>       switch (expr->type) {
>>       case EXPR_T_CMP:
>> -        return expr_annotate_cmp(expr, symtab, nesting, errorp);
>> +        return expr_annotate_cmp(expr, symtab, append_prereqs, nesting,
>> +                                 errorp);
>>
>>       case EXPR_T_AND:
>>       case EXPR_T_OR: {
>> +        const struct expr_symbol *unique_symbol =
>> expr_get_unique_symbol(expr);
>>           struct expr *sub, *next;
>>
>>           LIST_FOR_EACH_SAFE (sub, next, node, &expr->andor) {
>>               ovs_list_remove(&sub->node);
>> -            struct expr *new_sub = expr_annotate__(sub, symtab,
>> +            struct expr *new_sub = expr_annotate__(sub, symtab,
>> !unique_symbol,
>>                                                      nesting, errorp);
>>               if (!new_sub) {
>>                   expr_destroy(expr);
>> @@ -1767,6 +1796,12 @@ expr_annotate__(struct expr *expr, const struct
>> shash *symtab,
>>               expr_insert_andor(expr, next, new_sub);
>>           }
>>           *errorp = NULL;
>> +
>> +        if (unique_symbol) {
>> +            expr = expr_append_prereqs(expr, unique_symbol, symtab,
>> nesting,
>> +                                       errorp);
>> +        }
>> +
>>           return expr;
>>       }
>>
>> @@ -1802,7 +1837,7 @@ struct expr *
>>   expr_annotate(struct expr *expr, const struct shash *symtab, char
>> **errorp)
>>   {
>>       struct ovs_list nesting = OVS_LIST_INITIALIZER(&nesting);
>> -    return expr_annotate__(expr, symtab, &nesting, errorp);
>> +    return expr_annotate__(expr, symtab, true, &nesting, errorp);
>>   }
>>
>>   static struct expr *
>> diff --git a/tests/ovn.at b/tests/ovn.at
>> index 8fe4c522a..4abf44b06 100644
>> --- a/tests/ovn.at
>> +++ b/tests/ovn.at
>> @@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ AT_DATA([test-cases.txt], [[
>>   ip4.src == 1.2.3.4 => ip4.src == 0x1020304 && eth.type == 0x800
>>   ip4.src != 1.2.3.4 => ip4.src != 0x1020304 && eth.type == 0x800
>>   ip.proto == 123 => ip.proto == 0x7b && (eth.type == 0x800 || eth.type
>> == 0x86dd)
>> -ip.proto == {123, 234} => (ip.proto == 0x7b && (eth.type == 0x800 ||
>> eth.type == 0x86dd)) || (ip.proto == 0xea && (eth.type == 0x800 || eth.type
>> == 0x86dd))
>> +ip.proto == {123, 234} => (ip.proto == 0x7b || ip.proto == 0xea) &&
>> (eth.type == 0x800 || eth.type == 0x86dd)
>>   ip4.src == 1.2.3.4 && ip4.dst == 5.6.7.8 => ip4.src == 0x1020304 &&
>> eth.type == 0x800 && ip4.dst == 0x5060708 && eth.type == 0x800
>>
>>   ip => eth.type == 0x800 || eth.type == 0x86dd
>> @@ -1161,7 +1161,7 @@ get_nd(xxreg0, ip6.dst);
>>   # put_nd
>>   put_nd(inport, nd.target, nd.sll);
>>       encodes as push:NXM_NX_XXREG0[],push:NXM_
>> OF_ETH_SRC[],push:NXM_NX_ND_SLL[],push:NXM_NX_ND_TARGET[],po
>> p:NXM_NX_XXREG0[],pop:NXM_OF_ETH_SRC[],controller(userdata=
>> 00.00.00.04.00.00.00.00),pop:NXM_OF_ETH_SRC[],pop:NXM_NX_XXREG0[]
>> -    has prereqs ((icmp6.type == 0x87 && eth.type == 0x86dd && ip.proto
>> == 0x3a && (eth.type == 0x800 || eth.type == 0x86dd)) || (icmp6.type ==
>> 0x88 && eth.type == 0x86dd && ip.proto == 0x3a && (eth.type == 0x800 ||
>> eth.type == 0x86dd))) && icmp6.code == 0 && eth.type == 0x86dd && ip.proto
>> == 0x3a && (eth.type == 0x800 || eth.type == 0x86dd) && ip.ttl == 0xff &&
>> (eth.type == 0x800 || eth.type == 0x86dd) && icmp6.type == 0x87 && eth.type
>> == 0x86dd && ip.proto == 0x3a && (eth.type == 0x800 || eth.type == 0x86dd)
>> && icmp6.code == 0 && eth.type == 0x86dd && ip.proto == 0x3a && (eth.type
>> == 0x800 || eth.type == 0x86dd) && ip.ttl == 0xff && (eth.type == 0x800 ||
>> eth.type == 0x86dd)
>> +    has prereqs (icmp6.type == 0x87 || icmp6.type == 0x88) && eth.type
>> == 0x86dd && ip.proto == 0x3a && (eth.type == 0x800 || eth.type == 0x86dd)
>> && icmp6.code == 0 && eth.type == 0x86dd && ip.proto == 0x3a && (eth.type
>> == 0x800 || eth.type == 0x86dd) && ip.ttl == 0xff && (eth.type == 0x800 ||
>> eth.type == 0x86dd) && icmp6.type == 0x87 && eth.type == 0x86dd && ip.proto
>> == 0x3a && (eth.type == 0x800 || eth.type == 0x86dd) && icmp6.code == 0 &&
>> eth.type == 0x86dd && ip.proto == 0x3a && (eth.type == 0x800 || eth.type ==
>> 0x86dd) && ip.ttl == 0xff && (eth.type == 0x800 || eth.type == 0x86dd)
>>
>>   # put_dhcpv6_opts
>>   reg1[0] = put_dhcpv6_opts(ia_addr = ae70::4, server_id =
>> 00:00:00:00:10:02);
>> --
>> 2.14.3
>> _______________________________________________
>> dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
>
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to