On 23/05/18 10:08, Stokes, Ian wrote:
>> On 05/23/2018 09:38 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>>> On 23/05/18 09:14, Kevin Traynor wrote:
>>>> On 05/23/2018 08:48 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>>>>> On 23/05/18 08:41, Markos Chandras wrote:
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This was added in commit 91fccdad72a253a3892dcb3c4453a31833851bb7
>>>>>> ("netdev-dpdk: Free mempool only when no in-use mbufs."). I am not
>>>>>> sure how that ever built since that symbol was never exported by
>>>>>> the rte_mempool DPDK library
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I am also adding Kevin Traynor on CC who is the author of this commit.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> hi Markos, sorry for the trouble, I will send a fix this morning,
>>>>
>>>> thanks,
>>>> Kevin.
>>>>
>>> Hi Kevin,
>>>
>>> No problem. Thank you for working on this. A backport will also be
>>> needed for the following branches as well
>>>
>>> - branch-2.9
>>> - branch-2.8
>>> - branch-2.7
>>> - branch-2.6
>>>
>>
>> ACK
>
> Thanks for reporting this Markos, it seems to be a gap in the validation
> testing we conduct. Are you building with DPDK as a shared lib in this case?
> I hadn't come across the issue on my own system or in travis to date but it's
> obviously a problem.
>
Hi Ian,
Yeah we build against a shared DPDK library. By the looks of it, static
building should be fine though.
--
markos
SUSE LINUX GmbH | GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409, Nürnberg
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
