On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 4:06 AM, Han Zhou <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 3:27 PM, aginwala <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 2:52 PM, Han Zhou <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 11:40 PM, Numan Siddique <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 5:31 AM, aginwala <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > Thanks for the Review.
>>> > >
>>> > > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 11:36 AM, Numan Siddique <
>>> [email protected]>
>>> > > wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >> On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 12:13 AM, aginwala <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> > >>
>>> > >> > using pacemaker so that controllers can be placed in different
>>> fault
>>> > >> > domains.
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > Signed-off-by: aginwala <[email protected]>
>>> > >> >
>>> > >>
>>> > >> I see the below warning when applying the patch
>>> > >>
>>> > >> .git/rebase-apply/patch:153: new blank line at EOF.
>>> > >> +
>>> > >> warning: 1 line adds whitespace errors.
>>> > >>
>>> > > >>> Sure. Will fix.
>>> > >
>>> > >>
>>> > >> > ---
>>> > >> >  ovn/utilities/ovndb-servers.ocf | 83
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> > >>
>>> > >> > ++---------
>>> > >> >  1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > diff --git a/ovn/utilities/ovndb-servers.ocf
>>> > >> > b/ovn/utilities/ovndb-servers.ocf
>>> > >> > index 164b6bc..1b4b6ab 100755
>>> > >> > --- a/ovn/utilities/ovndb-servers.ocf
>>> > >> > +++ b/ovn/utilities/ovndb-servers.ocf
>>> > >> > @@ -9,6 +9,8 @@
>>> > >> >  : ${SB_MASTER_PROTO_DEFAULT="tcp"}
>>> > >> >  : ${MANAGE_NORTHD_DEFAULT="no"}
>>> > >> >  : ${INACTIVE_PROBE_DEFAULT="5000"}
>>> > >> > +: ${LISTEN_ON_MASTER_IP_ONLY_DEFAULT="yes"}
>>> > >> > +: ${LISTEN_ON_SLAVE_DEFAULT="yes"}
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> >  CRM_MASTER="${HA_SBIN_DIR}/crm_master -l reboot"
>>> > >> >  CRM_ATTR_REPL_INFO="${HA_SBIN_DIR}/crm_attribute --type
>>> crm_config
>>> > >> > --name OVN_REPL_INFO -s ovn_ovsdb_master_server"
>>> > >> > @@ -21,6 +23,14 @@ SB_MASTER_PROTO=${OCF_RESKEY_s
>>> > >> b_master_protocol:-${SB_
>>> > >> > MASTER_PROTO_DEFAULT}}
>>> > >> >  MANAGE_NORTHD=${OCF_RESKEY_manage_northd:-${MANAGE_NORTHD_D
>>> EFAULT}}
>>> > >> >  INACTIVE_PROBE=${OCF_RESKEY_inactive_probe_interval:-${
>>> > >> > INACTIVE_PROBE_DEFAULT}}
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > +# In order for pacemaker to work with LB, we can keep
>>> > >> > LISTEN_ON_MASTER_IP_ONLY
>>> > >> > +# to false and pass LB vip IP while creating pcs resource.
>>> > >> > +LISTEN_ON_MASTER_IP_ONLY=${OCF_RESKEY_listen_on_master_
>>> > >> > ip_only:-${LISTEN_ON_MASTER_IP_ONLY_DEFAULT}}
>>> > >> > +
>>> > >> > +# In order for pacemaker to work with LB, we can also set
>>> > >> LISTEN_ON_SLAVE
>>> > >> > +# to false so that slaves do not listen on 0.0.0.0.
>>> > >> > +LISTEN_ON_SLAVE=${OCF_RESKEY_listen_on_slave:-${LISTEN_ON_S
>>> > >> LAVE_DEFAULT}}
>>> > >> >
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> You need to define these parameters in the <parameters> section
>>> here -
>>> > >> https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/blob/master/ovn/
>>> > >> utilities/ovndb-servers.ocf#L118
>>> > >> Otherwise we will not be able to pass these options when starting
>>> the
>>> > >> resource. Ideally we want to do
>>> > >> "pcs resource create ovndb_servers .... listen_on_master_ip_only=no
>>> > >> listen_on_slave=no
>>> > >>
>>> > > >> Thanks for the pointer. I will update that and re-test.
>>> > >
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> +
>>> > >> >  # Invalid IP address is an address that can never exist in the
>>> > >> network, as
>>> > >> >  # mentioned in rfc-5737. The ovsdb servers connects to this IP
>>> address
>>> > >> > till
>>> > >> >  # a master is promoted and the IPAddr2 resource is started.
>>> > >> > @@ -157,22 +167,24 @@ ovsdb_server_notify() {
>>> > >> >              ${OVN_CTL} --ovn-manage-ovsdb=no start_northd
>>> > >> >          fi
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > -        conn=`ovn-nbctl get NB_global . connections`
>>> > >> > -        if [ "$conn" == "[]" ]
>>> > >> > -        then
>>> > >> > -            ovn-nbctl -- --id=@conn_uuid create Connection \
>>> > >> > +        # TODO: Need to troubleshoot as to removing target is ok
>>> as
>>> > >> well.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> +        if [ "x${LISTEN_ON_MASTER_IP_ONLY}" = xyes ]; then
>>> > >> >
>>> > >>
>>> > >> If LB VIP is used, you don't want to set the probe interval ?
>>> > >
>>> > > >>> I thought we can stick with common probe interval for any case.
>>> Hence,
>>> > > kept it.
>>> > >
>>> > >>
>>> > >> > +            conn=`ovn-nbctl get NB_global . connections`
>>> > >> > +            if [ "$conn" == "[]" ]
>>> > >> > +            then
>>> > >> > +                ovn-nbctl -- --id=@conn_uuid create Connection \
>>> > >> >  target="p${NB_MASTER_PROTO}\:${NB_MASTER_PORT}\:${MASTER_IP}" \
>>> > >> >  inactivity_probe=$INACTIVE_PROBE -- set NB_Global .
>>> > >> > connections=@conn_uuid
>>> > >> > -        fi
>>> > >> > +            fi
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > -        conn=`ovn-sbctl get SB_global . connections`
>>> > >> > -        if [ "$conn" == "[]" ]
>>> > >> > -        then
>>> > >> > -            ovn-sbctl -- --id=@conn_uuid create Connection \
>>> > >> > +            conn=`ovn-sbctl get SB_global . connections`
>>> > >> > +            if [ "$conn" == "[]" ]
>>> > >> > +            then
>>> > >> > +                ovn-sbctl -- --id=@conn_uuid create Connection \
>>> > >> >  target="p${SB_MASTER_PROTO}\:${SB_MASTER_PORT}\:${MASTER_IP}" \
>>> > >> >  inactivity_probe=$INACTIVE_PROBE -- set SB_Global .
>>> > >> > connections=@conn_uuid
>>> > >> > +            fi
>>> > >> >          fi
>>> > >> > -
>>> > >> >      else
>>> > >> >          if [ "$MANAGE_NORTHD" = "yes" ]; then
>>> > >> >              # Stop ovn-northd service. Set --ovn-manage-ovsdb=no
>>> so
>>> > >> that
>>> > >> > @@ -295,15 +307,15 @@ ovsdb_server_start() {
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> >      set ${OVN_CTL}
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > -    set $@ --db-nb-addr=${MASTER_IP}
>>> --db-nb-port=${NB_MASTER_PORT}
>>> > >> > -    set $@ --db-sb-addr=${MASTER_IP}
>>> --db-sb-port=${SB_MASTER_PORT}
>>> > >> > +    # For LB vip to talk to master pool member on a specific tcp
>>> port,
>>> > >> we
>>> > >> > need
>>> > >> > +    # to listen on 0.0.0.0.instead of master_ip
>>> > >> > +    if [ "x${LISTEN_ON_MASTER_IP_ONLY}" = xno ]; then
>>> > >> > +        set $@ --db-nb-port=${NB_MASTER_PORT}
>>> > >> > +        set $@ --db-sb-port=${SB_MASTER_PORT}
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > -    if [ "x${NB_MASTER_PROTO}" = xtcp ]; then
>>> > >> > -        set $@ --db-nb-create-insecure-remote=yes
>>> > >> > -    fi
>>> > >> > -
>>> > >> > -    if [ "x${SB_MASTER_PROTO}" = xtcp ]; then
>>> > >> > -        set $@ --db-sb-create-insecure-remote=yes
>>> > >> > +    else
>>> > >> > +       set $@ --db-nb-addr=${MASTER_IP}
>>> --db-nb-port=${NB_MASTER_PORT}
>>> > >> > +       set $@ --db-sb-addr=${MASTER_IP}
>>> --db-sb-port=${SB_MASTER_PORT}
>>> > >> >      fi
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> >      if [ "x${present_master}" = x ]; then
>>> > >> > @@ -313,15 +325,44 @@ ovsdb_server_start() {
>>> > >> >          # Force all copies to come up as slaves by pointing them
>>> into
>>> > >> >          # space and let pacemaker pick one to promote:
>>> > >> >          #
>>> > >> > +        if [ "x${NB_MASTER_PROTO}" = xtcp ]; then
>>> > >> > +            set $@ --db-nb-create-insecure-remote=yes
>>> > >> > +        fi
>>> > >> > +
>>> > >> > +        if [ "x${SB_MASTER_PROTO}" = xtcp ]; then
>>> > >> > +            set $@ --db-sb-create-insecure-remote=yes
>>> > >> > +        fi
>>> > >> >          set $@ --db-nb-sync-from-addr=${INVALID_IP_ADDRESS}
>>> > >> > --db-sb-sync-from-addr=${INVALID_IP_ADDRESS}
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> >      elif [ ${present_master} != ${host_name} ]; then
>>> > >> > +        if [ "x${LISTEN_ON_SLAVE}" = xno ]; then
>>> > >> > +            # TODO: for using LB vip, need to test for ssl.
>>> > >> > +            set $@ --db-nb-create-insecure-remote=no
>>> > >> >
>>> > >>
>>> > >> The default value of  "db-nb-create-insecure-remote" is no. So
>>> there is no
>>> > >> need to set this. We can just have
>>> > >> if [ "x${LISTEN_ON_SLAVE} = xyes ] ; then
>>> > >>  if ...
>>> > >>  ...
>>> > >> fi
>>> > >
>>> > > >>> Sure let me re-change and test. Will update the new patch
>>> accordingly.
>>> > >
>>> > >> +            set $@ --db-sb-create-insecure-remote=no
>>> > >> > +        else
>>> > >> > +            if [ "x${NB_MASTER_PROTO}" = xtcp ]; then
>>> > >> > +                set $@ --db-nb-create-insecure-remote=yes
>>> > >> > +            fi
>>> > >> > +
>>> > >> > +            if [ "x${SB_MASTER_PROTO}" = xtcp ]; then
>>> > >> > +                set $@ --db-sb-create-insecure-remote=yes
>>> > >> > +            fi
>>> > >> > +        fi
>>> > >> >          # An existing master is active, connect to it
>>> > >> >          set $@ --db-nb-sync-from-addr=${MASTER_IP}
>>> > >> > --db-sb-sync-from-addr=${MASTER_IP}
>>> > >> >          set $@ --db-nb-sync-from-port=${NB_MASTER_PORT}
>>> > >> >          set $@ --db-nb-sync-from-proto=${NB_MASTER_PROTO}
>>> > >> >          set $@ --db-sb-sync-from-port=${SB_MASTER_PORT}
>>> > >> >          set $@ --db-sb-sync-from-proto=${SB_MASTER_PROTO}
>>> > >> > +
>>> > >> > +    else
>>> > >> > +        if [ "x${NB_MASTER_PROTO}" = xtcp ]; then
>>> > >> > +            set $@ --db-nb-create-insecure-remote=yes
>>> > >> > +        fi
>>> > >> > +
>>> > >> > +        if [ "x${SB_MASTER_PROTO}" = xtcp ]; then
>>> > >> > +            set $@ --db-sb-create-insecure-remote=yes
>>> > >> > +        fi
>>> > >> >      fi
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> >      $@ start_ovsdb
>>> > >> > @@ -416,6 +457,11 @@ ovsdb_server_promote() {
>>> > >> >              ;;
>>> > >> >      esac
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > +    if [ "x${LISTEN_ON_SLAVE}" = xno ]; then
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> The use of LISTEN_ON_SLAVE param in "ovsdb_server_promote"  is very
>>> > >> confusing. I think it should
>>> > >> be possible to have just one param - something like -
>>> > >> "master_ip_pacemaker_resource=(yes/no)"  (or some thing better ).
>>> > >> Thoughts ?
>>> > >
>>> > > >>> Sure, how about master_ip_lb_resource to avoid confusion? So you
>>> > > mean, just use this variable and completely get rid of
>>> LISTEN_ON_SLAVE
>>> > > and LISTEN_ON_MASTER_IP_ONLY?
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> > 'master_ip_lb_resource' seems fine to me. Thats' right. Just have one
>>> > parameter.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Will there be a case where the user can select
>>> > >> listen_on_master_ip_only=no and
>>> > >> listen_on_slave=yes ?
>>> > >>
>>> > > >>> No.
>>> >
>>> 'master_ip_lb_resource' seems a little confusing to me. What does it
>>> really mean?
>>> The desired behavior is, when the flag is "no", do the default:
>>>
>>> - On both master node and slave node, listen to MASTER_IP only
>>>
>>> When the flag is "yes", it works with an external LB:
>>>
>>> 1) On mater node, listen on 0.0.0.0 (because the MASTER_IP doesn't
>>> belong to the node)
>>> 2) On slave node, don't listen on TCP port (because we want the LB to be
>>> able to tell which one is the master according to whether the TCP port is
>>> open on the node)
>>>
>>> I am ok with just one parameter, but I'd suggest to make it more
>>> straighforward. I am also wondering, can we unify point 2), i.e. never
>>> listen on TCP port for slave node? Numan, do you have any use case for
>>> accessing slave node DBs using TCP?
>>>
>>

I don't think there is any use case. I actually thought about this and I
think it makes sense to unify. The only concern I had was whenever a slave
is promoted, it needs a restart of ovsdb-servers. But I think it's not a
big deal. It would require a little more testing from my side to make sure
that it doesn't break the existing behaviour.
@Aliasgar - Are you OK spinning another patch  unifying this ? What do you
think ? Also we can rename the parameter back to "listen_on_master_ip_only"
if we unify this.




>
>>> >>> Thanks Han for the review. We agreed on this name just to avoid
>> confusion that IP is coming from LB and not pacemaker ipaddr2 resource.  I
>> can update the documentation to avoid confusion since documentation have no
>> details of using LB VIP. Let me know if that needs to be in same or
>> different patch.
>>
>
> I am fine if we can better document the purpose of the parameter and the
> expected behavior. I think it is always good to be in same patch for the
> change and its documentation.
>
+1

Thanks
Numan



>
> Thanks,
> Han
>
>
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to