On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 10:07:14AM -0700, Ansis Atteka wrote: > On Wed, Jun 6, 2018, 7:31 AM Aaron Conole <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Aaron Conole <[email protected]> writes: > > > > > Currently, Open vSwitch on linux embeds the logic of loading and > > unloading > > > kernel modules into the ovs-ctl and ovs-lib script files. This works, > > but > > > it means that there is no way to leverage extended filesystem attributes > > > to grant fine grain permissions relating to module loading. > > > > > > The split out utility 'ovs-kmod-ctl' will be used in an upcoming commit > > > for RHEL-based distributions to have a separate transition domain that > > > will allow module loading to be given to a separate selinux domain from > > > the openvswitch_t domain. > > > > > > Acked-By: Timothy Redaelli <[email protected]> > > > Signed-off-by: Aaron Conole <[email protected]> > > > --- > > > debian/openvswitch-switch.install | 1 + > > > debian/openvswitch-switch.manpages | 1 + > > > rhel/openvswitch-fedora.spec.in | 2 + > > > rhel/openvswitch.spec.in | 2 + > > > utilities/.gitignore | 1 + > > > utilities/automake.mk | 5 + > > > utilities/ovs-ctl.in | 32 +------ > > > utilities/ovs-kmod-ctl.8 | 109 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > utilities/ovs-kmod-ctl.in | 183 > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > utilities/ovs-lib.in | 20 +--- > > > 10 files changed, 311 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-) > > > create mode 100644 utilities/ovs-kmod-ctl.8 > > > create mode 100644 utilities/ovs-kmod-ctl.in > > > > ... > > > > > + if test -e /sys/module/ip_gre; then > > > + action "Forcing removal of ip_gre module" rmmod ip_gre > > > + fi > > > + > > > + if test -e /sys/module/gre; then > > > + action "Forcing removal of gre module" rmmod gre > > > + fi > > > > I think this block will no longer successfully apply since > > a94f9524dbc11c78c83d1a49959497f5e73bf949. I got caught in the > > apply/revert storm :) > > > > How should I proceed? Should I send an incremental, a new spin of this > > patch, or a new spin of the series? > > > > Since the conflict was easy to resolve, then I don't think you need to do > anything this time. Once I will push this patch, you can keep an eye on it > just to double check that I resolved the conflict correctly.
Does this series need anything? _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
