On 11 Jun 2018, at 18:21, Tiago Lam wrote:

From: Mark Kavanagh <[email protected]>

dp_packets are created using xmalloc(); in the case of OvS-DPDK, it's
possible the the resultant mbuf portion of the dp_packet contains
random data. For some mbuf fields, specifically those related to
multi-segment mbufs and/or offload features, random values may cause
unexpected behaviour, should the dp_packet's contents be later copied
to a DPDK mbuf. It is critical therefore, that these fields should be
initialized to 0.

This patch ensures that the following mbuf fields are initialized to
appropriate values on creation of a new dp_packet:
   - ol_flags=0
   - nb_segs=1
   - tx_offload=0
   - packet_type=0
   - next=NULL

Adapted from an idea by Michael Qiu <[email protected]>:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/777570/

Co-authored-by: Tiago Lam <[email protected]>

Signed-off-by: Mark Kavanagh <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tiago Lam <[email protected]>
---
 lib/dp-packet.h | 8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/dp-packet.h b/lib/dp-packet.h
index 596cfe6..82e45ad 100644
--- a/lib/dp-packet.h
+++ b/lib/dp-packet.h
@@ -626,13 +626,15 @@ dp_packet_mbuf_rss_flag_reset(struct dp_packet *p OVS_UNUSED)

 /* This initialization is needed for packets that do not come
  * from DPDK interfaces, when vswitchd is built with --with-dpdk.
- * The DPDK rte library will still otherwise manage the mbuf.
- * We only need to initialize the mbuf ol_flags. */
+ * The DPDK rte library will still otherwise manage the mbuf. */
 static inline void
 dp_packet_mbuf_init(struct dp_packet *p OVS_UNUSED)
 {
 #ifdef DPDK_NETDEV
-    p->mbuf.ol_flags = 0;
+    struct rte_mbuf *mbuf = &(p->mbuf);
+    mbuf->ol_flags = mbuf->tx_offload = mbuf->packet_type = 0;
+    mbuf->nb_segs = 1;
+    mbuf->next = NULL;

Are we sure this is all we need? Asking as rte_pktmbuf_reset() cleans of some more field, so want to make sure we hit all the corner cases. Unfortunately, we can not use it here due to the sanity check.

 #endif
 }

--
2.7.4
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to