On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 08:20:19AM -0700, Justin Pettit wrote: > > > On Jun 20, 2018, at 8:15 AM, Aaron Conole <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > 0-day Robot <[email protected]> writes: > > > >> Bleep bloop. Greetings Justin Pettit, I am a robot and I have tried out > >> your patch > >> with message ID <[email protected]> > >> Thanks for your contribution. > >> > >> I encountered some error that I wasn't expecting. See the details below. > >> > >> > >> checkpatch: > >> == Checking "0000.patch" == > >> ERROR: Too many signoffs; are you missing Co-authored-by lines? > >> Lines checked: 118, Warnings: 0, Errors: 1 > > > > I'll fix the sign off check in checkpatch. It shouldn't flag on these > > kinds of patches. > > > > Sorry for the noise. > > No problem. Thanks for setting it up. I agree that it shouldn't flag > on this issue, however, the bigger concern I have is that the warning > seems to be separated from the file names, which is a bit confusing. > And, I imagine it would be very confusing if someone had multiple > patches flagged, since it wouldn't be clear which error list applied > to which patch.
What file names? Sign-offs aren't associated with files. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
