On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 04:16:42PM -0700, Darrell Ball wrote: > Signed-off-by: Darrell Ball <[email protected]>
I wonder whether coverage counters would be a better alternative? They use thread-local data so incrementing them is cheaper than atomic increments, at least if they are accessed from multiple CPUs. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
