On 7/13/2018 6:13 PM, Ian Stokes wrote:
On 7/10/2018 2:23 PM, Sugesh Chandran wrote:
Configuring flow control at ixgbe netdev-init is throwing error in port
start.

For eg: without this fix, user cannot configure flow control on ixgbe dpdk
port as below,

"
     ovs-vsctl add-port br0 dpdk0 -- set Interface dpdk0 type=dpdk \
         options:dpdk-devargs=0000:05:00.1 options:rx-flow-ctrl=true
"

Instead,  it must be configured as two different commands,

"
     ovs-vsctl add-port br0 dpdk0 -- set Interface dpdk0 type=dpdk \
                options:dpdk-devargs=0000:05:00.1
     ovs-vsctl set Interface dpdk0 options:rx-flow-ctrl=true
"

The DPDK ixgbe driver is now validating all the 'rte_eth_fc_conf' fields before
trying to configuring the dpdk ethdev. Hence OVS can no longer set the
'dont care' fields to just '0' as before. This commit make sure all the
'rte_eth_fc_conf' fields are populated with default values before the dev
init.


Thanks for the patch Sugesh, I've applied to dpdk_merge and it will be part of this weeks pull request.

I assume it should be backported to OVS 2.9 at least, do you know if it should go to 2.8/2.7 also?

Hi Sugesh,

during further testing I found this breaks functionality for Virtual functions with OVS (specifically tested with igb_vf, i40e_vf and ixgbe_vf).

The port itself will fail to initialize with the following error:

netdev_dpdk|INFO|cannot get flow control parameters on port 2, err=-95

And is not added. as such I think flow control should only be optional as there is no guarantee it will be available for a given dpdk device and if unavailable it should not stop the port from being initialized.

I've pulled this patch from the merge request for master, I think the branch patches will have to be reworked also.

Ian

Ian
Signed-off-by: Sugesh Chandran <sugesh.chand...@intel.com>
---
  lib/netdev-dpdk.c | 15 +++++++--------
  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/netdev-dpdk.c b/lib/netdev-dpdk.c
index bb4d60f26..023b80d3e 100644
--- a/lib/netdev-dpdk.c
+++ b/lib/netdev-dpdk.c
@@ -1065,14 +1065,6 @@ dpdk_eth_dev_init(struct netdev_dpdk *dev)
      mbp_priv = rte_mempool_get_priv(dev->dpdk_mp->mp);
      dev->buf_size = mbp_priv->mbuf_data_room_size - RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM;
-
-    /* Get the Flow control configuration for DPDK-ETH */
-    diag = rte_eth_dev_flow_ctrl_get(dev->port_id, &dev->fc_conf);
-    if (diag) {
-        VLOG_DBG("cannot get flow control parameters on port "DPDK_PORT_ID_FMT
-                 ", err=%d", dev->port_id, diag);
-    }
-
      return 0;
  }
@@ -1773,6 +1765,13 @@ netdev_dpdk_set_config(struct netdev *netdev, const struct smap *args,
      autoneg = smap_get_bool(args, "flow-ctrl-autoneg", false);
      fc_mode = fc_mode_set[tx_fc_en][rx_fc_en];
+    /* Get the Flow control configuration for DPDK-ETH */
+    err = rte_eth_dev_flow_ctrl_get(dev->port_id, &dev->fc_conf);
+    if (err) {
+        VLOG_INFO("cannot get flow control parameters on port "DPDK_PORT_ID_FMT
+                 ", err=%d", dev->port_id, err);
+    }
+
      if (dev->fc_conf.mode != fc_mode || autoneg != dev->fc_conf.autoneg) {
          dev->fc_conf.mode = fc_mode;
          dev->fc_conf.autoneg = autoneg;


_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to