On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 10:34:37AM -0700, William Tu wrote: > On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 9:22 AM, Greg Rose <[email protected]> wrote: > > Upstream commit: > > Before the patch, the erspan BSO bit (Bad/Short/Oversized) is not > > handled. BSO has 4 possible values: > > 00 --> Good frame with no error, or unknown integrity > > 11 --> Payload is a Bad Frame with CRC or Alignment Error > > 01 --> Payload is a Short Frame > > 10 --> Payload is an Oversized Frame > > > > Based the short/oversized definitions in RFC1757, the patch sets > > the bso bit based on the mirrored packet's size. > > > > Reported-by: Xiaoyan Jin <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: William Tu <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> > > > > Cc: William Tu <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Greg Rose <[email protected]> > > --- > > Thanks, I forgot to backport this one. > > Acked-by: William Tu <[email protected]>
Thanks Greg and William. I applied this to master and branch-2.10. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
