Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> writes: > Today we've seen some failure reports from the robot because the build > was broken on master. That will happen occasionally (often, as in this > case, because the robot uses a GCC version different from the > submitter). Maybe the robot should even report it, probably in a > general email to the list rather than a followup to a particular patch. > But it's not helpful to report those errors as related to a particular > patch. > > So, maybe the robot should build the upstream branch before it applies > the patch. If that build fails, it shouldn't bother to report the error > relative to the patch in question (but maybe as a general error to the > list). It could then apply the patch and report anything from > checkpatch.
Good idea. I'll try to implement it as soon as I can. In the mean time apologies for the bot going haywire. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
