On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 11:32 AM, Yifeng Sun <[email protected]> wrote:

> Introduce a new test that doesn't setup native erspan v2 tunnels but sends
> simulated raw packets.
> This test is supposed to only run for kernel version from 4.4.x to 4.15.x.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yifeng Sun <[email protected]>
> ---
>  tests/system-traffic.at | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 44 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tests/system-traffic.at b/tests/system-traffic.at
> index 44669f8..64b37df 100644
> --- a/tests/system-traffic.at
> +++ b/tests/system-traffic.at
> @@ -670,6 +670,50 @@ AT_CHECK([tcpdump -xx -r p0.pcap 2>&1 | egrep "IP
> 172.31.1.100 > 172.31.1.1: GRE
>  OVS_TRAFFIC_VSWITCHD_STOP
>  AT_CLEANUP
>
> +AT_SETUP([datapath - ping over erspan v2 tunnel by simulated packets])
> +OVS_CHECK_KERNEL(4, 4, 15)
> +
> +OVS_TRAFFIC_VSWITCHD_START()
> +AT_CHECK([ovs-vsctl -- set bridge br0 other-config:hwaddr=\"f2:ff:
> 00:00:00:01\"])
> +ADD_BR([br-underlay], [set bridge br-underlay other-config:hwaddr=\"f2:ff:
> 00:00:00:02\"])
> +
> +AT_CHECK([ovs-ofctl add-flow br0 "actions=normal"])
> +AT_CHECK([ovs-ofctl add-flow br-underlay "actions=normal"])
> +
> +ADD_NAMESPACES(at_ns0)
> +
> +dnl Set up underlay link from host into the namespace using veth pair.
> +ADD_VETH(p0, at_ns0, br-underlay, "172.31.1.1/24", f2:ff:00:00:00:03)
> +AT_CHECK([ip addr add dev br-underlay "172.31.1.100/24"])
> +AT_CHECK([ip link set dev br-underlay up])
> +
> +dnl Set up tunnel endpoints on OVS outside the namespace and simulate a
> native
> +dnl linux device inside the namespace.
> +ADD_OVS_TUNNEL([erspan], [br0], [at_erspan0], [172.31.1.1], [
> 10.1.1.100/24], [options:key=1 options:erspan_ver=2 options:erspan_dir=1
> options:erspan_hwid=0x7])
> +
> +ip netns exec at_ns0 tcpdump -U -i p0 -w p0.pcap &
> +sleep 1
> +
> +dnl First, check the underlay
> +NS_CHECK_EXEC([at_ns0], [ping -q -c 3 -i 0.3 -w 2 172.31.1.100 |
> FORMAT_PING], [0], [dnl
> +3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms
> +])
> +
> +dnl Okay, send raw arp request and icmp echo request.
> +ovs-ofctl -O OpenFlow13 packet-out br-underlay "in_port=1 packet=
> f2ff00000002f2ff00000003080045000052373d4000402fa89cac1f0101
> ac1f0164100088be00000006200000016f54b41700008078ffffffffffff
> f2ff0000000408060001080006040001f2ff000000040a0101010000000000000a010164
> actions=normal"
> +
> +sleep 1
> +AT_CHECK([tcpdump -xx -r p0.pcap 2>&1 | egrep "0806 0001 0800 0604 0002
> f2ff 0000" 2>&1 1>/dev/null])
> +AT_CHECK([tcpdump -xx -r p0.pcap 2>&1 | egrep "0a01 0164 f2ff 0000 0004
> 0a01 0101" 2>&1 1>/dev/null])
> +
> +ovs-ofctl -O OpenFlow13 packet-out br-underlay "in_port=1 packet=
> f2ff00000002f2ff0000000308004500009287e14000402f57b8ac1f0101
> ac1f0164100088be0000000520000001144cd5a400008078f2ff00000001
> f2ff0000000408004500005c38d640004001eb640a0101010a0101640800
> 5e57585f0001df6c6b5b0000000045bc0500000000001011121314151617
> 18191a1b1c1d1e1f202122232425262728292a2b2c2d2e2f303132333435363738393a3b3c3d3e3f
> actions=normal"
>

The above packet hex is already encapsulated with ERSPAN
(https://www.gasmi.net/hpd/ can help decode)
So this packet does not exercise the ERSPAN implementation in OVS.

Can we generate packet from br0 instead of br-underlay?

Thanks
William


> +
> +sleep 1
> +AT_CHECK([tcpdump -xx -r p0.pcap 2>&1 | egrep "IP 172.31.1.100 >
> 172.31.1.1: GREv0, .* length 126" 2>&1 1>/dev/null])
> +
> +OVS_TRAFFIC_VSWITCHD_STOP
> +AT_CLEANUP
> +
>  AT_SETUP([datapath - clone action])
>  OVS_TRAFFIC_VSWITCHD_START()
>
> --
> 2.7.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
>
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to