On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 04:19:51PM -0700, Yi-Hung Wei wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 4:07 PM Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 09:56:26AM -0700, Yi-Hung Wei wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 6:18 AM Tiago Lam <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Commit 3f1087c added a per zone limit test which relied on the
> > > > CHECK_CT_DPIF_FLUSH_BY_CT_TUPLE m4 macro to skip the test when executing
> > > > in a userspace datapath (since the per zone limit feature is not yet
> > > > implemented in userspace). That macro, however, has been removed in
> > > > commit 271e48a ("conntrack: Support conntrack flush by ct 5-tuple")
> > > > which was causing the test to fail when executing in userspace.
> > > >
> > > > Instead, a new m4 macro, CHECK_CT_DPIF_PER_ZONE_LIMIT, is introduced to
> > > > make the same differentiation, until userspace doesn't support the per
> > > > zone limit.
> > > >
> > > > CC: Yi-Hung Wei <[email protected]>
> > > > Fixes: 3f1087c ("system-traffic: Add conntrack per zone limit test 
> > > > case")
> > > > Signed-off-by: Tiago Lam <[email protected]>
> > > > ---
> > > Thanks Tiago for the fix. I will work on the userspace zone limitation 
> > > later on.
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Yi-Hung Wei <[email protected]>
> >
> > Thanks Tiago and Yi-Hung.  I applied this to master.  Let me know if I
> > should backport it.
> 
> Hi Ben,
> 
> Please help to backport it to branch-2.10.

Done.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to