Hi Ophir, Could you please send out v2 of this patch with the changes from Kevin? I will test it in our lab to see if its working
Regards _Sugesh > -----Original Message----- > From: Eelco Chaudron [mailto:echau...@redhat.com] > Sent: Wednesday, September 5, 2018 1:35 PM > To: Ophir Munk <ophi...@mellanox.com> > Cc: Kevin Traynor <ktray...@redhat.com>; Chandran, Sugesh > <sugesh.chand...@intel.com>; ovs-dev@openvswitch.org; Shahaf Shuler > <shah...@mellanox.com>; Asaf Penso <as...@mellanox.com>; Thomas > Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net> > Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [dpdk-hwol PATCH v1] netdev-dpdk: Upgrade to dpdk > v18.08.0 > > Hi Ophir, > > I get the same error when trying this with an XL710, wanted to see if the > patch > would work for non-root users. > Did not further troubleshoot it. > > Also I get the following compile warnings(errors): > > mv -f $depbase.Tpo $depbase.Po > lib/netdev-dpdk.c: In function 'netdev_dpdk_destruct': > lib/netdev-dpdk.c:1331:9: error: 'rte_eth_dev_detach' is deprecated (declared > at > /home/root/OVS_dpdk-hwol_DPDK_v18.08/dpdk/x86_64-native-linuxapp- > gcc/include/rte_ethdev.h:1451) > [-Werror=deprecated-declarations] > if (rte_eth_dev_detach(dev->port_id, devname) < 0) { > ^ > lib/netdev-dpdk.c: In function 'netdev_dpdk_process_devargs': > lib/netdev-dpdk.c:1624:13: error: 'rte_eth_dev_attach' is deprecated (declared > at > /home/root/OVS_dpdk-hwol_DPDK_v18.08/dpdk/x86_64-native-linuxapp- > gcc/include/rte_ethdev.h:1435) > [-Werror=deprecated-declarations] > if (!rte_eth_dev_attach(devargs, &new_port_id)) { > ^ > lib/netdev-dpdk.c: In function 'netdev_dpdk_detach': > lib/netdev-dpdk.c:3154:5: error: 'rte_eth_dev_detach' is deprecated (declared > at > /home/root/OVS_dpdk-hwol_DPDK_v18.08/dpdk/x86_64-native-linuxapp- > gcc/include/rte_ethdev.h:1451) > [-Werror=deprecated-declarations] > ret = rte_eth_dev_detach(port_id, devname); > ^ > lib/netdev-dpdk.c: At top level: > > > //Eelco > > > On 5 Sep 2018, at 12:44, Ophir Munk wrote: > > > Hi, > > I suggest the following trouble-shooting steps: > > 1. Try Kevin's fix for Niantic (attached here as a non-official patch > > on top of latest dpdk-hwol branch). > > Sugesh - can you please try it? > > 2. Sugesh - do you have the same issue with other NICs than Niantic on > > latest dpdk-hwol branch? (other NICs used to work a month > > ago) > > 3. I will try on my setup. > > > > Regards, > > Ophir > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Kevin Traynor [mailto:ktray...@redhat.com] > >> Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2018 9:28 AM > >> To: Chandran, Sugesh <sugesh.chand...@intel.com>; Ophir Munk > >> <ophi...@mellanox.com>; ovs-dev@openvswitch.org > >> Cc: Asaf Penso <as...@mellanox.com>; Stokes, Ian > >> <ian.sto...@intel.com>; Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org>; Shahaf Shuler > >> <shah...@mellanox.com>; Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net>; > Olga > >> Shern <ol...@mellanox.com> > >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-hwol PATCH v1] netdev-dpdk: Upgrade to dpdk > >> v18.08.0 > >> > >> On 09/05/2018 07:44 AM, Chandran, Sugesh wrote: > >>> Hi Ophir, > >>> > >>> Thank you for working on this. > >>> I tried to run some tests and getting some errors while adding > >>> physical ports as below. I use Niantic NIC for this test > >>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>> 2018-09-05T06:34:58Z|00069|dpdk|INFO|Device with port_id=0 already > >>> stopped 2018-09-05T06:34:58Z|00070|dpdk|ERR|Ethdev port_id=0 invalid > >>> rss_hf: 0x3afbc, valid value: 0x38d34 > >>> 2018-09-05T06:34:58Z|00071|netdev_dpdk|WARN|Interface dpdk0 > >> eth_dev > >>> setup error Invalid argument > >>> 2018-09-05T06:34:58Z|00072|netdev_dpdk|ERR|Interface dpdk0(rxq:2 > >> txq:2 > >>> lsc interrupt mode:false) configure error: Invalid argument > >>> 2018-09-05T06:34:58Z|00073|dpif_netdev|ERR|Failed to set interface > >>> dpdk0 new configuration 2018-09- > >> 05T06:34:58Z|00074|bridge|WARN|could > >>> not add network device dpdk0 to ofproto (No such device) > >>> ovs-vsctl: Error detected while setting up 'dpdk0': could not add > >>> network > >> device dpdk0 to ofproto (No such device). See ovs-vswitchd log for > >> details. > >>> ovs-vsctl: The default log directory is > >>> "/usr/local/var/log/openvswitch". > >>> > >> > >> I didn't have time to compare the below patch with the ones that I > >> did, but I saw that this patch was needed for niantic > >> https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgi > >> t > >> hub.com%2Fkevintraynor%2Fovs-dpdk- > >> master%2Fcommit%2F88f46cc5ab338eb4f3ca5db1eacd0effefe4fa0c&d > >> ata=02%7C01%7Cophirmu%40mellanox.com%7Cd203c89637bf4f27835508d > >> 61309798e%7Ca652971c7d2e4d9ba6a4d149256f461b%7C0%7C0%7C63671 > >> 7328752336932&sdata=L7rWODNNEStIfibwXybu6Ub7Yvn%2BfLHk6VT > >> we14jxyY%3D&reserved=0 > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>> Please find below for my comments. > >>> > >>> > >>> Regards > >>> _Sugesh > >>> > >>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>> From: Ophir Munk [mailto:ophi...@mellanox.com] > >>>> Sent: Monday, September 3, 2018 3:19 PM > >>>> To: ovs-dev@openvswitch.org > >>>> Cc: Asaf Penso <as...@mellanox.com>; Chandran, Sugesh > >>>> <sugesh.chand...@intel.com>; Stokes, Ian <ian.sto...@intel.com>; > >>>> Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org>; Shahaf Shuler <shah...@mellanox.com>; > >>>> Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net>; Olga Shern > >>>> <ol...@mellanox.com>; Ophir Munk <ophi...@mellanox.com>; Kevin > >>>> Traynor <ktray...@redhat.com> > >>>> Subject: [dpdk-hwol PATCH v1] netdev-dpdk: Upgrade to dpdk v18.08.0 > >>>> > >>>> 1. Enable compilation and linkage with dpdk 18.08.0 The following > >>>> dpdk commits which were introduced after dpdk 17.11.x require OVS > >>>> updates to accommodate to the dpdk changes. > >>>> - ce17eddefc20 ("ethdev: introduce Rx queue offloads API") > >>>> - ab3ce1e0c193 ("ethdev: remove old offload API") > >>>> - c06ddf9698e0 ("meter: add configuration profile") > >>>> - e58638c32411 ("ethdev: fix TPID handling in flow API") > >>>> - cd8c7c7ce241 ("ethdev: replace bus specific struct with generic > >>>> dev") > >>>> - ac8d22de2394 ("ethdev: flatten RSS configuration in flow API") > >>>> > >>>> 2. Update references to DPDK version in Documentation > >>>> > >>>> 3. Update DPDK version in travis' linux-build script > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Ophir Munk <ophi...@mellanox.com> > >>>> --- > >>>> .travis/linux-build.sh | 2 +- > >>>> Documentation/faq/releases.rst | 2 +- > >>>> lib/netdev-dpdk.c | 135 > >>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- > >> ---- > >>>> 3 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) > >>>> > >>>> diff --git a/.travis/linux-build.sh b/.travis/linux-build.sh index > >>>> 4b9fc4a..c60ac71 > >>>> 100755 > >>>> --- a/.travis/linux-build.sh > >>>> +++ b/.travis/linux-build.sh > >>>> @@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ fi > >>>> > >>>> if [ "$DPDK" ]; then > >>>> if [ -z "$DPDK_VER" ]; then > >>>> - DPDK_VER="17.11.3" > >>>> + DPDK_VER="18.08.0" > >>>> fi > >>>> install_dpdk $DPDK_VER > >>>> if [ "$CC" = "clang" ]; then > >>>> diff --git a/Documentation/faq/releases.rst > >>>> b/Documentation/faq/releases.rst index 41d41e3..646ae09 100644 > >>>> --- a/Documentation/faq/releases.rst > >>>> +++ b/Documentation/faq/releases.rst > >>>> @@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ Q: What DPDK version does each Open vSwitch > >>>> release work with? > >>>> 2.7.x 16.11.7 > >>>> 2.8.x 17.05.2 > >>>> 2.9.x 17.11.3 > >>>> - 2.10.x 17.11.3 > >>>> + 2.10.x 18.08.0 > >>>> ============ ======= > >>>> > >>>> Q: Are all the DPDK releases that OVS versions work with > >>>> maintained? > >>>> diff --git a/lib/netdev-dpdk.c b/lib/netdev-dpdk.c index > >>>> f91aa27..80d2af9 > >>>> 100644 > >>>> --- a/lib/netdev-dpdk.c > >>>> +++ b/lib/netdev-dpdk.c > >>>> @@ -168,11 +168,7 @@ static const struct rte_eth_conf port_conf = { > >>>> .rxmode = { > >>>> .mq_mode = ETH_MQ_RX_RSS, > >>>> .split_hdr_size = 0, > >>>> - .header_split = 0, /* Header Split disabled */ > >>>> - .hw_ip_checksum = 0, /* IP checksum offload disabled */ > >>>> - .hw_vlan_filter = 0, /* VLAN filtering disabled */ > >>>> - .jumbo_frame = 0, /* Jumbo Frame Support disabled */ > >>>> - .hw_strip_crc = 0, > >>>> + .offloads = 0, > >>>> }, > >>>> .rx_adv_conf = { > >>>> .rss_conf = { > >>>> @@ -364,6 +360,7 @@ struct dpdk_ring { struct ingress_policer { > >>>> struct rte_meter_srtcm_params app_srtcm_params; > >>>> struct rte_meter_srtcm in_policer; > >>>> + struct rte_meter_srtcm_profile in_prof; > >>>> rte_spinlock_t policer_lock; > >>>> }; > >>>> > >>>> @@ -903,16 +900,17 @@ dpdk_eth_dev_port_config(struct netdev_dpdk > >>>> *dev, int n_rxq, int n_txq) > >>>> if (dev->mtu > ETHER_MTU) { > >>>> rte_eth_dev_info_get(dev->port_id, &info); > >>>> if (strncmp(info.driver_name, "net_nfp", 7)) { > >>>> - conf.rxmode.enable_scatter = 1; > >>>> + conf.rxmode.offloads |= DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_SCATTER; > >>>> } > >>>> } > >>>> > >>>> conf.intr_conf.lsc = dev->lsc_interrupt_mode; > >>>> - conf.rxmode.hw_ip_checksum = (dev->hw_ol_features & > >>>> - NETDEV_RX_CHECKSUM_OFFLOAD) != > >>>> 0; > >>>> + conf.rxmode.offloads |= ((dev->hw_ol_features & > >>>> + NETDEV_RX_CHECKSUM_OFFLOAD) != 0) ? > >>>> + DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_CHECKSUM : 0; > >>>> > >>>> if (dev->hw_ol_features & NETDEV_RX_HW_CRC_STRIP) { > >>>> - conf.rxmode.hw_strip_crc = 1; > >>>> + conf.rxmode.offloads |= DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_CRC_STRIP; > >>>> } > >>>> > >>>> /* A device may report more queues than it makes available > >>>> (this has @@ - > >>>> 1932,16 +1930,18 @@ netdev_dpdk_eth_tx_burst(struct netdev_dpdk > >> *dev, > >>>> int qid, > >>>> > >>>> static inline bool > >>>> netdev_dpdk_policer_pkt_handle(struct rte_meter_srtcm *meter, > >>>> + struct rte_meter_srtcm_profile > >>>> + *profile, > >>>> struct rte_mbuf *pkt, uint64_t > >>>> time) { > >>>> uint32_t pkt_len = rte_pktmbuf_pkt_len(pkt) - sizeof(struct > >>>> ether_hdr); > >>>> > >>>> - return rte_meter_srtcm_color_blind_check(meter, time, pkt_len) > >>>> == > >>>> + return rte_meter_srtcm_color_blind_check(meter, profile, time, > >>>> + pkt_len) == > >>>> e_RTE_METER_GREEN; > >>>> } > >>>> > >>>> static int > >>>> netdev_dpdk_policer_run(struct rte_meter_srtcm *meter, > >>>> + struct rte_meter_srtcm_profile *profile, > >>>> struct rte_mbuf **pkts, int pkt_cnt, > >>>> bool should_steal) { @@ -1953,7 +1953,8 > >>>> @@ netdev_dpdk_policer_run(struct rte_meter_srtcm *meter, > >>>> for (i = 0; i < pkt_cnt; i++) { > >>>> pkt = pkts[i]; > >>>> /* Handle current packet */ > >>>> - if (netdev_dpdk_policer_pkt_handle(meter, pkt, > >>>> current_time)) { > >>>> + if (netdev_dpdk_policer_pkt_handle(meter, profile, pkt, > >>>> + current_time)) { > >>>> if (cnt != i) { > >>>> pkts[cnt] = pkt; > >>>> } > >>>> @@ -1975,8 +1976,8 @@ ingress_policer_run(struct ingress_policer > >>>> *policer, struct rte_mbuf **pkts, > >>>> int cnt = 0; > >>>> > >>>> rte_spinlock_lock(&policer->policer_lock); > >>>> - cnt = netdev_dpdk_policer_run(&policer->in_policer, pkts, > >>>> - pkt_cnt, should_steal); > >>>> + cnt = netdev_dpdk_policer_run(&policer->in_policer, &policer- > >>> in_prof, > >>>> + pkts, pkt_cnt, should_steal); > >>>> rte_spinlock_unlock(&policer->policer_lock); > >>>> > >>>> return cnt; > >>>> @@ -2767,8 +2768,15 @@ netdev_dpdk_policer_construct(uint32_t rate, > >>>> uint32_t burst) > >>>> policer->app_srtcm_params.cir = rate_bytes; > >>>> policer->app_srtcm_params.cbs = burst_bytes; > >>>> policer->app_srtcm_params.ebs = 0; > >>>> + err = rte_meter_srtcm_profile_config(&policer->in_prof, > >>>> + > >>>> &policer->app_srtcm_params); > >>>> + if (err) { > >>>> + VLOG_ERR("Could not create rte meter profile for ingress > >>>> policer"); > >>>> + free(policer); > >>>> + return NULL; > >>>> + } > >>>> err = rte_meter_srtcm_config(&policer->in_policer, > >>>> - &policer->app_srtcm_params); > >>>> + &policer->in_prof); > >>>> if (err) { > >>>> VLOG_ERR("Could not create rte meter for ingress > >>>> policer"); > >>>> free(policer); > >>>> @@ -3043,13 +3051,18 @@ netdev_dpdk_get_status(const struct netdev > >>>> *netdev, struct smap *args) > >>>> smap_add_format(args, "if_descr", "%s %s", rte_version(), > >>>> > >>>> dev_info.driver_name); > >>>> > >>>> - if (dev_info.pci_dev) { > >>>> - smap_add_format(args, "pci-vendor_id", "0x%x", > >>>> - dev_info.pci_dev->id.vendor_id); > >>>> - smap_add_format(args, "pci-device_id", "0x%x", > >>>> - dev_info.pci_dev->id.device_id); > >>>> + const struct rte_bus *bus; > >>>> + const struct rte_pci_device *pci_dev; > >>>> + bus = rte_bus_find_by_device(dev_info.device); > >>>> + if (bus && !strcmp(bus->name, "pci")) { > >>>> + pci_dev = RTE_DEV_TO_PCI(dev_info.device); > >>>> + if (pci_dev) { > >>>> + smap_add_format(args, "pci-vendor_id", "0x%u", > >>>> + pci_dev->id.vendor_id); > >>>> + smap_add_format(args, "pci-device_id", "0x%x", > >>>> + pci_dev->id.device_id); > >>>> + } > >>>> } > >>>> - > >>>> return 0; > >>>> } > >>>> > >>>> @@ -3727,6 +3740,7 @@ struct egress_policer { > >>>> struct qos_conf qos_conf; > >>>> struct rte_meter_srtcm_params app_srtcm_params; > >>>> struct rte_meter_srtcm egress_meter; > >>>> + struct rte_meter_srtcm_profile egress_prof; > >>>> }; > >>>> > >>>> static void > >>>> @@ -3749,8 +3763,16 @@ egress_policer_qos_construct(const struct > >> smap > >>>> *details, > >>>> policer = xmalloc(sizeof *policer); > >>>> qos_conf_init(&policer->qos_conf, &egress_policer_ops); > >>>> egress_policer_details_to_param(details, > >>>> &policer->app_srtcm_params); > >>>> + err = rte_meter_srtcm_profile_config(&policer->egress_prof, > >>>> + > >>>> &policer->app_srtcm_params); > >>>> + if (err) { > >>> [Sugesh] Should we error out the message on failing the profile > >>> config?? > >>>> + free(policer); > >>>> + *conf = NULL; > >>>> + return -err; > >>>> + } > >>>> err = rte_meter_srtcm_config(&policer->egress_meter, > >>>> - &policer->app_srtcm_params); > >>>> + &policer->egress_prof); > >>>> + > >>>> if (!err) { > >>>> *conf = &policer->qos_conf; > >>>> } else { > >>>> @@ -3803,7 +3825,8 @@ egress_policer_run(struct qos_conf *conf, > >>>> struct rte_mbuf **pkts, int pkt_cnt, > >>>> struct egress_policer *policer = > >>>> CONTAINER_OF(conf, struct egress_policer, qos_conf); > >>>> > >>>> - cnt = netdev_dpdk_policer_run(&policer->egress_meter, pkts, > >>>> + cnt = netdev_dpdk_policer_run(&policer->egress_meter, > >>>> + &policer->egress_prof, pkts, > >>>> pkt_cnt, should_steal); > >>>> > >>>> return cnt; > >>>> @@ -4103,15 +4126,15 @@ dump_flow_pattern(struct rte_flow_item > >> *item) > >>>> > >>>> VLOG_DBG("rte flow vlan pattern:\n"); > >>>> if (vlan_spec) { > >>>> - VLOG_DBG(" Spec: tpid=0x%"PRIx16", > >>>> tci=0x%"PRIx16"\n", > >>>> - ntohs(vlan_spec->tpid), > >>>> ntohs(vlan_spec->tci)); > >>>> + VLOG_DBG(" Spec: inner_type=0x%"PRIx16", > >>>> tci=0x%"PRIx16"\n", > >>>> + ntohs(vlan_spec->inner_type), > >>>> + ntohs(vlan_spec->tci)); > >>>> } else { > >>>> VLOG_DBG(" Spec = null\n"); > >>>> } > >>>> > >>>> if (vlan_mask) { > >>>> - VLOG_DBG(" Mask: tpid=0x%"PRIx16", > >>>> tci=0x%"PRIx16"\n", > >>>> - vlan_mask->tpid, vlan_mask->tci); > >>>> + VLOG_DBG(" Mask: inner_type=0x%"PRIx16", > >> tci=0x%"PRIx16"\n", > >>>> + vlan_mask->inner_type, vlan_mask->tci); > >>>> } else { > >>>> VLOG_DBG(" Mask = null\n"); > >>>> } > >>>> @@ -4281,27 +4304,56 @@ add_flow_action(struct flow_actions > >> *actions, > >>>> enum rte_flow_action_type type, > >>>> actions->cnt++; > >>>> } > >>>> > >>>> +/* > >>>> + * Storage for struct rte_flow_action_rss > >>>> + * including storage for key and queue array */ #define > >>>> +MAX_RSS_HASH_KEY_LENGTH 128 #define > >> MAX_ACTION_RSS_QUEUE_NUM > >>>> 128 > >>>> +struct action_rss_data { > >>>> + struct rte_flow_action_rss conf; > >>>> + uint16_t queue[MAX_ACTION_RSS_QUEUE_NUM]; > >>>> + uint8_t key[MAX_RSS_HASH_KEY_LENGTH]; }; > >>>> + > >>>> static struct rte_flow_action_rss * add_flow_rss_action(struct > >>>> flow_actions *actions, > >>>> struct netdev *netdev) { > >>>> int i; > >>>> - struct rte_flow_action_rss *rss; > >>>> + struct action_rss_data *rss_data; > >>>> > >>>> - rss = xmalloc(sizeof(*rss) + sizeof(uint16_t) * > >>>> netdev->n_rxq); > >>>> - /* > >>>> - * Setting it to NULL will let the driver use the default RSS > >>>> - * configuration we have set: &port_conf.rx_adv_conf.rss_conf. > >>>> - */ > >>>> - rss->rss_conf = NULL; > >>>> - rss->num = netdev->n_rxq; > >>>> + if (netdev->n_rxq > MAX_ACTION_RSS_QUEUE_NUM) { > >>>> + VLOG_ERR("Num of rxq (%u) must not be greater " \ > >>>> + "than max rss num of queues (%u)", > >>>> + netdev->n_rxq, MAX_ACTION_RSS_QUEUE_NUM); > >>>> + return NULL; > >>>> + } > >>>> > >>>> - for (i = 0; i < rss->num; i++) { > >>>> - rss->queue[i] = i; > >>>> + rss_data = xmalloc(sizeof(struct action_rss_data)); > >>>> + *rss_data = (struct action_rss_data){ > >>>> + .conf = (struct rte_flow_action_rss){ > >>>> + .func = RTE_ETH_HASH_FUNCTION_DEFAULT, > >>>> + .level = 0, > >>>> + .types = ETH_RSS_IP, > >>>> + .key_len = 0, > >>>> + .queue_num = netdev->n_rxq, > >>>> + .queue = rss_data->queue, > >>>> + .key = rss_data->key, > >>>> + }, > >>>> + .key = { 0 }, > >>>> + .queue = { 0 }, > >>>> + }; > >>>> + > >>>> + /* TODO: Override key with default */ > >>> [Sugesh] Do we really need this TODO?? > >>>> + > >>>> + /* Override queue array with default */ > >>>> + for (i = 0; i < rss_data->conf.queue_num; i++) { > >>>> + rss_data->queue[i] = i; > >>>> } > >>>> > >>>> - add_flow_action(actions, RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_RSS, rss); > >>>> + add_flow_action(actions, RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_RSS, > >>>> + &rss_data->conf); > >>>> > >>>> - return rss; > >>>> + return &rss_data->conf; > >>>> } > >>>> > >>>> static int > >>>> @@ -4365,7 +4417,7 @@ netdev_dpdk_add_rte_flow_offload(struct > >> netdev > >>>> *netdev, > >>>> vlan_mask.tci = match->wc.masks.vlans[0].tci & > >>>> ~htons(VLAN_CFI); > >>>> > >>>> /* match any protocols */ > >>>> - vlan_mask.tpid = 0; > >>>> + vlan_mask.inner_type = 0; > >>>> > >>>> add_flow_pattern(&patterns, RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_VLAN, > >>>> &vlan_spec, &vlan_mask); @@ -4516,6 > >>>> +4568,11 @@ > >>>> end_proto_check: > >>>> > >>>> struct rte_flow_action_rss *rss; > >>>> rss = add_flow_rss_action(&actions, netdev); > >>>> + if (!rss) { > >>>> + VLOG_ERR("add_flow_rss_action error.\n"); > >>> I feel this error can be bit more verbose something like Failed to > >>> add > >> rss_flow+actions or something?? What do you think? > >>>> + ret = -1; > >>>> + goto out; > >>>> + } > >>>> add_flow_action(&actions, RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_END, NULL); > >>>> > >>>> flow = rte_flow_create(dev->port_id, &flow_attr, > >>>> patterns.items, > >>>> -- > >>>> 1.8.3.1 > >>> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > dev mailing list > > d...@openvswitch.org > > https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev _______________________________________________ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
