On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 03:15:21PM -0400, Eric Garver wrote: > On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 03:03:19AM +0000, Lilijun (Jerry, Cloud Networking) > wrote: > > Hi Eric, > > > > Yes, I agree with that effect. > > But how about this issue of QinQ that we can only support at most 2 VLANs ? > > Do you have any ideas? > > I was not NACKing the idea. Just wanted everyone to understand the > implications of increasing the VLAN field size. > > I tried playing with the fields, but didn't come with a reasonable way > to rearrange them to make room for the extra VLANs. > > I'm curious what you're use case is for triple VLAN. I wonder if VXLAN > or PBB (802.1ah) is a better solution.
I'd also like to know what datapath we're talking about. The Linux kernel datapath only supports 2 VLANs in any case. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
