Thanks.  I applied these patches to master.

On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 11:26:54AM -0700, Yifeng Sun wrote:
> Thanks for the fix, looks good to me.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Yifeng Sun <[email protected]>
> 
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 1:59 PM Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > This fixes leaks on the error path in parse_intel_port_custom_property().
> >
> > ofp_print_ofpst_port_reply() failed to free the custom_stats in decoded
> > port stats.  This fixes the problem.
> >
> > parse_intel_port_custom_property() had a memory leak if there was more than
> > one custom stats property (which there shouldn't be, but still).  This
> > fixes the problem.
> >
> > There was a function netdev_free_custom_stats_counters() meant for freeing
> > custom_stats, but hardly anything used it.  This adopts it consistently.
> >
> > It wasn't safe to free the custom stats if ofputil_decode_port_stats()
> > returned an error.  Using netdev_free_custom_stats_counters() avoids this
> > pitfall.
> >
> > Reported-at: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=9972
> > Signed-off-by
> > <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=9972Signed-off-by>:
> > Ben Pfaff <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  lib/ofp-port.c  | 9 ++++++++-
> >  lib/ofp-print.c | 1 +
> >  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/ofp-port.c b/lib/ofp-port.c
> > index 8d882a14b4df..ec70f46e96bb 100644
> > --- a/lib/ofp-port.c
> > +++ b/lib/ofp-port.c
> > @@ -1608,6 +1608,7 @@ parse_intel_port_custom_property(struct ofpbuf
> > *payload,
> >
> >      ops->custom_stats.size = ntohs(custom_stats->stats_array_size);
> >
> > +    netdev_free_custom_stats_counters(&ops->custom_stats);
> >      ops->custom_stats.counters = xcalloc(ops->custom_stats.size,
> >                                           sizeof
> > *ops->custom_stats.counters);
> >
> > @@ -1618,6 +1619,7 @@ parse_intel_port_custom_property(struct ofpbuf
> > *payload,
> >          uint8_t *name_len = ofpbuf_try_pull(payload, sizeof *name_len);
> >          char *name = name_len ? ofpbuf_try_pull(payload, *name_len) :
> > NULL;
> >          if (!name_len || !name) {
> > +            netdev_free_custom_stats_counters(&ops->custom_stats);
> >              return OFPERR_OFPBPC_BAD_LEN;
> >          }
> >
> > @@ -1628,6 +1630,7 @@ parse_intel_port_custom_property(struct ofpbuf
> > *payload,
> >          /* Counter value. */
> >          ovs_be64 *value = ofpbuf_try_pull(payload, sizeof *value);
> >          if (!value) {
> > +            netdev_free_custom_stats_counters(&ops->custom_stats);
> >              return OFPERR_OFPBPC_BAD_LEN;
> >          }
> >          c->value = ntohll(get_unaligned_be64(value));
> > @@ -1714,6 +1717,7 @@ ofputil_count_port_stats(const struct ofp_header *oh)
> >          if (ofputil_decode_port_stats(&ps, &b)) {
> >              return n;
> >          }
> > +        netdev_free_custom_stats_counters(&ps.custom_stats);
> >      }
> >  }
> >
> > @@ -1726,7 +1730,10 @@ ofputil_count_port_stats(const struct ofp_header
> > *oh)
> >   * null and not modify them between calls.
> >   *
> >   * Returns 0 if successful, EOF if no replies were left in this 'msg',
> > - * otherwise a positive errno value. */
> > + * otherwise a positive errno value.
> > + *
> > + * On success, the caller must eventually free ps->custom_stats.counters,
> > + * with netdev_free_custom_stats_counters(&ps->custom_stats). */
> >  int
> >  ofputil_decode_port_stats(struct ofputil_port_stats *ps, struct ofpbuf
> > *msg)
> >  {
> > diff --git a/lib/ofp-print.c b/lib/ofp-print.c
> > index cf93d2e2cb38..e05a969a82b0 100644
> > --- a/lib/ofp-print.c
> > +++ b/lib/ofp-print.c
> > @@ -561,6 +561,7 @@ ofp_print_ofpst_port_reply(struct ds *string, const
> > struct ofp_header *oh,
> >              return retval != EOF ? retval : 0;
> >          }
> >          ofputil_format_port_stats(string, &ps, port_map);
> > +        netdev_free_custom_stats_counters(&ps.custom_stats);
> >      }
> >  }
> >
> > --
> > 2.16.1
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > dev mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
> >
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to