On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 09:49:15AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 11:48:58AM +0530, nusid...@redhat.com wrote: > > From: Numan Siddique <nusid...@redhat.com> > > > > The test "ovn-nbctl: LBs - daemon" fails when it runs the command > > "ovn-nbctl lb-add lb0 30.0.0.1a 192.168.10.10:80,192.168.10.20:80". > > ovn-nbctl > > extracts the vip by calling the socket util function 'inet_parse_active()', > > and this function blocks when it calls dns_resolve(). It blocks because > > networking is disabled with mock rpm build. Why dns_resolve() blocks, needs > > to be investigated and fixed there. But to unblock this issue quickly, this > > patch provides a fix in OVS itself. > > > > This patch adds a new function - inet_parse_active_address_and_port() which > > expects IP:[port] address in the 'target_' argument and disables resolving > > the host. > > > > This new function is now used in ovn-northd, ovn-nbctl and ovn-trace. It is > > fine > > to use this function as load balancer VIP cannot be a hostname. > > > > Reported-by: Timothy Redaelli <tredae...@redhat.com> > > Reported-at: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1641672 > > Tested-by: Timothy Redaelli <tredae...@redhat.com> > > Signed-off-by: Numan Siddique <nusid...@redhat.com> > > --- > > > > v1 -> v2 > > ------- > > * Addressed review comments from Mark > > - Updated the documentation of the inet_parse_active() > > - Used the new function inet_parse_active_address_and_port() > > in ovn-trace > > I don't understand the function naming here. Why would one expect a > function with the name inet_parse_active_address_and_port() to not > accept DNS names whereas the function inet_parse_active() does?
Also why can't we investigate why dns_resolve() blocks? _______________________________________________ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
