Kevin Traynor <[email protected]> writes:

> On 12/19/2018 08:23 AM, Darrell Ball wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 6:57 PM 0-day Robot <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> Bleep bloop.  Greetings Darrell Ball, I am a robot and I have tried out
>>> your patch.
>>> Thanks for your contribution.
>>>
>>> I encountered some error that I wasn't expecting.  See the details below.
>>>
>>>
>>> checkpatch:
>>> ERROR: Too many signoffs; are you missing Co-authored-by lines?
>>> Lines checked: 37, Warnings: 0, Errors: 1
>>>
>> 
>> I don't understand this complaint.
>> 
>
> This is a false positive. I've seen patchwork duplicate signed-off-by's
> in an mbox before (reported to Stephen,
> https://github.com/getpatchwork/patchwork/issues/219) which would cause
> this error, but downloading this mbox locally it seems ok.

It's a false positive, but not for that reason.  The bot keeps up to date
with the most recent checkpatch, so it stamps a sign-off as part of the
delivery chain. The older branch checkpatch version doesn't understand
that.

We probably should either backport 3267343a8487 ("checkpatch: Improve
accuracy and specificity of sign-off checking.") to the relevant
branches so that when someone submits a patch on the branch it's
checked, -OR- improve the robot to just save off the latest checkpatch
version before starting to apply patches.  I like the idea of the former
so that checkpatch changes can self-check, but it comes with a drawback
(like checkpatch changes won't be invoked until after they're applied to
the tree .. I guess it isn't such a big deal, though).

OTOH, there is maybe a problem, either with this series or with the 2.10
branch:

  https://travis-ci.org/ovsrobot/ovs/jobs/469834347

Not sure how this series would have anything to do with it, since the
failing tests aren't conntrack related as far as I can tell.  Maybe
worth checking out, though.  Probably some missing commit.

Thanks, and sorry for the spam!

>> 
>> 
>>>
>>>
>>> Please check this out.  If you feel there has been an error, please email
>>> [email protected]
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> 0-day Robot
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
>> 
>
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to