Alin Gabriel Serdean <[email protected]> writes:

> Using python `sys.exit(-1)` on Windows produces mixed results.
> Let's take the following results from different shells:
> CMD
>>python -c "import sys; sys.exit(-1)" & echo %errorlevel%
> 1
> MSYS
> $ python -c "import sys; sys.exit(-1)" && echo $?
> 0
> WSL
> $ python -c "import sys; sys.exit(-1)"; echo $?
> 255
>
> this results in the following tests to fail:
> checkpatch
>
>  10: checkpatch - sign-offs                          FAILED (checkpatch.at:32)
>  11: checkpatch - parenthesized constructs           FAILED (checkpatch.at:32)
>  12: checkpatch - parenthesized constructs - for     FAILED (checkpatch.at:32)
>  13: checkpatch - comments                           FAILED (checkpatch.at:32)
>
> because of:
>  ./checkpatch.at:32: exit code was 0, expected 255
>
> This patch introduces a positive constant for the default exit code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alin Gabriel Serdean <[email protected]>
> ---

Acked-by: Aaron Conole <[email protected]>

With one little fixup:

1. either we should eliminate the result argument to
   ovs_checkpatch_print_result

2. or the test for the result < 0 needs to change to if result:

Otherwise, when an error is introduced, the exit code will be
propagated, but the printout will be confusing:

  03:30:50 aconole {(0a8c1ec04...)} ~/git/ovs$ git commit -m "dpdk: This is a 
test
  Just testing
  "
  ERROR: C99 style comment
  #10 FILE: lib/dpdk.c:17:
  // BREAK!!

Lines checked: 15, no obvious problems found

:-)

>  utilities/checkpatch.py | 13 +++++++------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/utilities/checkpatch.py b/utilities/checkpatch.py
> index 8eab31f60..8b305f2ad 100755
> --- a/utilities/checkpatch.py
> +++ b/utilities/checkpatch.py
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ import sys
>  RETURN_CHECK_INITIAL_STATE = 0
>  RETURN_CHECK_STATE_WITH_RETURN = 1
>  RETURN_CHECK_AWAITING_BRACE = 2
> +EXIT_CODE = 255
>  __errors = 0
>  __warnings = 0
>  empty_return_check_state = 0
> @@ -837,7 +838,7 @@ def ovs_checkpatch_parse(text, filename, author=None, 
> committer=None):
>  
>      run_file_checks(text)
>      if __errors or __warnings:
> -        return -1
> +        return EXIT_CODE
>      return 0
>  
>  
> @@ -920,7 +921,7 @@ if __name__ == '__main__':
>                                         "quiet"])
>      except:
>          print("Unknown option encountered. Please rerun with -h for help.")
> -        sys.exit(-1)
> +        sys.exit(EXIT_CODE)
>  
>      for o, a in optlist:
>          if o in ("-h", "--help"):
> @@ -946,7 +947,7 @@ if __name__ == '__main__':
>              quiet = True
>          else:
>              print("Unknown option '%s'" % o)
> -            sys.exit(-1)
> +            sys.exit(EXIT_CODE)
>  
>      if sys.stdout.isatty():
>          colors = True
> @@ -974,13 +975,13 @@ Subject: %s
>              result = ovs_checkpatch_parse(patch, revision)
>              ovs_checkpatch_print_result(result)
>              if result:
> -                status = -1
> +                status = EXIT_CODE
>          sys.exit(status)
>  
>      if not args:
>          if sys.stdin.isatty():
>              usage()
> -            sys.exit(-1)
> +            sys.exit(EXIT_CODE)
>          result = ovs_checkpatch_parse(sys.stdin.read(), '-')
>          ovs_checkpatch_print_result(result)
>          sys.exit(result)
> @@ -991,5 +992,5 @@ Subject: %s
>              print('== Checking "%s" ==' % filename)
>          result = ovs_checkpatch_file(filename)
>          if result:
> -            status = -1
> +            status = EXIT_CODE
>      sys.exit(status)
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to