> On Oct 29, 2018, at 3:57 PM, Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> wrote: > > Normally it makes sense for an active connection to be primary and a > passive connection to be a service connection, but I've run into a corner > case where it is better for a passive connection to be a primary > connection. This specific case is for use with OFtest, which expects to be > a primary controller. However, it also wants to reconnect frequently, > which is slow for active connections because of the backoff; by > configuring a passive, primary controller, OFtest can reconnect as > frequently and as quickly as it wants, making the overall test much faster. > > Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff <[email protected]>
Nice. Have you made the necessary changes for OFtest? Acked-by: Justin Pettit <[email protected]> --Justin _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
