On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 10:53:53PM +0530, Numan Siddique wrote: > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 8:33 AM Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> wrote: > > > The OpenFlow syntax looks really weird. I don't understand it at all. > > > > By OpenFlow syntax you mean the way this action is being used ? > > i.e "check_pkt_larger(1500)->NXM_NX_REG0[0]" ? > > I referred the existing action load and tried to use it the same way. > I will think of a better way.
That's what I meant. (Like some of my other comments, this is a complaint where I don't have a better alternative to propose.) > > There isn't any documentation, but some is needed. > > > > Tests are needed. > > > > Ack. > I didn't work on these as I wanted to get feedback about the approach in > general. Sure, understood. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
