On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 03:01:20PM -0700, Darrell Ball wrote: > There are a few cases where structure copy can be replaced by > memcpy(), for possible portability benefit. This is because > the structures involved have padding and elements of the > structure are used to generate hashes. > > Signed-off-by: Darrell Ball <[email protected]>
Thanks, applied to master, 2.11, 2.10. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
