It does sounds like this is a case that could be handled better without going to the gateway.
On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 04:07:06PM +0200, Daniel Alvarez Sanchez wrote: > Even I successfully tested this before getting merged, I just hit some > scenario where traffic goes to the gateway node. If we have logical > port lp1 with a dnat_and_snat NAT rule to fip1 and from lp1 you ping > fip1, the traffic is leaving the hypervisor to the gateway node and > comes back to lp1. > > I'd expect this traffic to be recirculated within the OVN bridge and > not being pushed out through the localnet port. It may be a corner > case but I believe it should be taken into account. What do you folks > think? > > Cheers, > Daniel > > On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 7:41 PM Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Sat, Apr 06, 2019 at 05:42:52PM +0200, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote: > > > When DVR is enabled FIP traffic need to be forwarded directly using > > > external connection to the underlay network and not be distributed > > > through geneve tunnels. > > > Fix this adding new logical flows to take care of distributed DNAT/SNAT > > > > > > Acked-by: Mark Michelson <[email protected]> > > > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <[email protected]> > > > > Thanks, applied to master. > > _______________________________________________ > > dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
