On 4/25/2019 11:09 AM, Ilya Maximets wrote:
"On 24.04.2019 20:03, Ian Stokes wrote:
Modify travis linux build script to use the latest
DPDK stable release 18.11.1. Update docs for latest
DPDK stable releases.

Signed-off-by: Ian Stokes <[email protected]>
---
  .travis/linux-build.sh                   | 2 +-
  Documentation/faq/releases.rst           | 4 ++--
  Documentation/intro/install/dpdk.rst     | 8 ++++----
  Documentation/topics/dpdk/vhost-user.rst | 6 +++---
  4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

Do we need a NEWS update for this change?
18.11.1 should not have any user-visible changes from the OVS
point of view, however upcoming 18.11.2 will have in case we'll
merge vhost destroy_connection related patch. The questions are:
Are we going to add stable release updates to NEWS?
We can, if people think it's of use. It's now mentioned in the release notes of 18.11.1 that OVS DPDK was validated, so adding an entry into NEWS for the next OVS dot release could help push users to use the correct DPDK to OVS release mapping. To date we still see users on xx.yy.0 LTS releases which I'd like to encourage to move on.

Do we need to mention stable releases that has no direct impact
on OVS itself?
If it has no impact then we can just add an item into NEWS saying it's been validated and is supported. If there is a known impact then we should detail the nature of that impact, typically NEWS has an entry of 'various bug fixes' or something to that effect, are you thinking we should provide specifics of the bug fix that affects users as part of NEWS from now on? I don't see the harm once we are aware of it.

Ian


_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to