On Wed, May 8, 2019, 20:35 Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 04:15:59PM -0400, Aaron Conole wrote: > > Hi Numan, > > > > (also, CC'ing Mark) > > > > 0-day Robot <[email protected]> writes: > > > > > Bleep bloop. Greetings Numan Siddique, I am a robot and I have tried > out your patch. > > > Thanks for your contribution. > > > > > > I encountered some error that I wasn't expecting. See the details > below. > > > > I think it makes sense to use the 'ovn-org/ovn' bracketed string as a > > way of sending the patch to the OVN github repo for processing. I'm > > glad you proposed something with this patch. > > > > Is there any objection to settling on that? Then I can make the bot "do > > the right thing" :-) > > To me it seems longer than necessary, I'd think "ovn" by itself would be > enough. >
I agree with Ben. The longer the required patch prefix, the less information can be conveyed in the first line of the commit message > _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
