On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 2:09 PM Numan Siddique <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 5:38 AM Ankur Sharma <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi Han, >> >> Thanks for review. >> >> Yup, looks like it, although I did not try the scenario myself, but yes >> entry are not getting removed once added, >> hence, new mac bindings will not be added after some time (as existing >> count reaches 1000). >> >> Regards, >> Ankur >> >> From: Han Zhou <[email protected]> >> Sent: Friday, May 10, 2019 4:47 PM >> To: Ankur Sharma <[email protected]> >> Cc: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v1] OVN: Fix the ovn-controller 100% usage >> issue with put_mac_bindings >> >> >> >> On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 2:46 PM Ankur Sharma <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> > >> > ISSUE: >> > a. As soon as entries get added to put_mac_bindings in pinctrl.c, >> > ovn-controller CPU consumption reached 100%. >> > >> > b. This happens because in wait_put_mac_bindings, >> > if !hmap_is_empty(&put_mac_bindings) succeeds and >> > calls poll_immediat_wake(). >> > >> > ovn-controller.log: >> > "2019-05-10T19:43:28.035Z|00035|poll_loop|INFO|wakeup due to >> > 0-ms timeout at ovn/controller/pinctrl.c:2520 (99% CPU usage)" >> > >> > ROOT_CAUSE: >> > a. Earlier it used to work fine, because in run_put_mac_bindings >> > all the bindings in put_mac_bindings would be flushed. >> > >> > b. Looks like, as a part of adding a new thread in pinctrl, this >> > line got replaced with calling buffer_put_mac_bindings. >> > >> > " >> > . >> > . >> > . >> > /* Move the mac bindings from 'put_mac_bindings' hmap to >> > * 'buffered_mac_bindings' and notify the pinctrl_handler. >> > * pinctrl_handler will reinject the buffered packets. */ >> > if (!hmap_is_empty(&put_mac_bindings)) { >> > buffer_put_mac_bindings(); >> > notify_pinctrl_handler(); >> > } >> > " >> > >> > c. Because of which put_mac_bindings is never emptied and >> wait_put_mac_bindings >> > ends up doing poll_immediate_wake. >> > >> > FIX: >> > a. Added call to flush_put_mac_bindings back in >> > run_put_mac_bindings. >> > >> > b. Additioanlly, logic mentioned in ROOT_CAUSE.b has been changed >> > in 1c24b2f490ba002bbfeb23006965188a7c5b9747, hence updated >> > the documentation in pinctrl.c accordingly. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Ankur Sharma <[email protected]<mailto: >> [email protected]>> >> > --- >> > ovn/controller/pinctrl.c | 9 ++++++--- >> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> > >> > diff --git a/ovn/controller/pinctrl.c b/ovn/controller/pinctrl.c >> > index 8ae1f9b..b7bb4c9 100644 >> > --- a/ovn/controller/pinctrl.c >> > +++ b/ovn/controller/pinctrl.c >> > @@ -91,11 +91,13 @@ VLOG_DEFINE_THIS_MODULE(pinctrl); >> > * >> > * - arp/nd_ns - These actions generate an ARP/IPv6 Neighbor >> solicit >> > * requests. The original packets are buffered and >> > - * injected back when put_arp/put_nd actions are >> called. >> > + * injected back when put_arp/put_nd resolves >> > + * corresponding ARP/IPv6 Neighbor solicit >> requests. >> > * When pinctrl_run(), writes the mac bindings >> from the >> > * 'put_mac_bindings' hmap to the MAC_Binding >> table in >> > - * SB DB, it moves these mac bindings to another >> hmap - >> > - * 'buffered_mac_bindings'. >> > + * SB DB, run_buffered_binding will add the >> buffered >> > + * packets to buffered_mac_bindings and notify >> > + * pinctrl_handler. >> > * >> > * The pinctrl_handler thread calls the function - >> > * send_mac_binding_buffered_pkts(), which uses >> > @@ -2468,6 +2470,7 @@ run_put_mac_bindings(struct ovsdb_idl_txn >> *ovnsb_idl_txn, >> > sbrec_mac_binding_by_lport_ip, >> > pmb); >> > } >> > + "flush_put_mac_bindings(); > > > Thanks for the patch and finding the issue. This is a big mistake from me > when I added the pinctrl_thread. > > Instead of calling "flush_put_mac_bindings()" in the function > "run_put_mac_bindings()" > I would suggest to use - HMAP_FOR_EACH_POP in run_put_mac_bindings() and > then free > pmb after the call to run_put_mac_binding(). > > If you see flush_put_mac_bindings() also does the same thing. We can avoid > running the for loop twice. > You can ignore my suggestion. Calling flush_put_mac_bindings() seems much cleaner. Acked-by: Numan Siddique <[email protected]> Thanks Numan > Thanks > Numan > > > } >> > >> > static void >> > -- >> > 1.8.3.1 >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > dev mailing list >> > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> >> > https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev [ >> mail.openvswitch.org]< >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mail.openvswitch.org_mailman_listinfo_ovs-2Ddev&d=DwMFaQ&c=s883GpUCOChKOHiocYtGcg&r=mZwX9gFQgeJHzTg-68aCJgsODyUEVsHGFOfL90J6MJY&m=P-XiYg1pCA7c5_H6MKaFGMBLWLPE7GAfuUnfELvcIGY&s=6QBH6hjY9c7Vc-Bh4_AzkwWJBBGuOH3Y2v7sXIIU-kc&e= >> > >> >> Thanks for the fix. Does it mean the the mac-binding will not work after >> some time since it is never flushed, and the check >> "hmap_count(&put_mac_bindings) >= 1000" in pinctrl_handle_put_mac_binding() >> will prevent any new mac-binding being handled? >> >> The fix looks good to me. >> >> Acked-by: Han Zhou <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> >> _______________________________________________ >> dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev >> > _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
