On 30.05.2019 11:05, Li RongQing wrote:
> otherwise it maybe lead to out of bound access in tx_q
>
> Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <[email protected]>
> ---
> lib/netdev-dpdk.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/netdev-dpdk.c b/lib/netdev-dpdk.c
> index c06f46931..e6cdcd454 100644
> --- a/lib/netdev-dpdk.c
> +++ b/lib/netdev-dpdk.c
> @@ -2319,8 +2319,6 @@ __netdev_dpdk_vhost_send(struct netdev *netdev, int qid,
> int i, retries = 0;
> int vid = netdev_dpdk_get_vid(dev);
>
> - qid = dev->tx_q[qid % netdev->n_txq].map;
'qid' passed to the function can't be negative. However, after
mapping it could become negative if corresponding queue disabled
and not mapped to another queue. Moving the mapping after the
check you're creating the case where we'll try to send to the
negative queue. So, this patch actually creates the issue that it
describes in the commit message.
> -
> if (OVS_UNLIKELY(vid < 0 || !dev->vhost_reconfigured || qid < 0
> || !(dev->flags & NETDEV_UP))) {
> rte_spinlock_lock(&dev->stats_lock);
> @@ -2329,6 +2327,8 @@ __netdev_dpdk_vhost_send(struct netdev *netdev, int qid,
> goto out;
> }
>
> + qid = dev->tx_q[qid % netdev->n_txq].map;
> +
> rte_spinlock_lock(&dev->tx_q[qid].tx_lock);
>
> cnt = netdev_dpdk_filter_packet_len(dev, cur_pkts, cnt);
>
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
