On 7/10/2019 4:40 PM, Van Haaren, Harry wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Stokes, Ian
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2019 4:30 PM
To: Van Haaren, Harry <harry.van.haa...@intel.com>; d...@openvswitch.org
Cc: i.maxim...@samsung.com; malvika.gu...@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/5] dpif-netdev: implement function pointers/subtable

On 7/9/2019 1:34 PM, Harry van Haaren wrote:
This allows plugging-in of different subtable hash-lookup-verify
routines, and allows special casing of those functions based on
known context (eg: # of bits set) of the specific subtable.

Signed-off-by: Harry van Haaren <harry.van.haa...@intel.com>
Tested-by: Malvika Gupta <malvika.gu...@arm.com>


Thanks for this harry, few minor comments below.

Hey, cool I'll snip away irrelevant code sections for readability.


<snip>

<snip>


I've thought about whether an item should be added to the NEWS doc
(possibly not in this patch but perhaps later in the series), it's hard
to say as the changes are under the hood and not configurable by a user.
Thoughts?

Correct the user shouldn't identify the actual changes, except for small
gains in performance if the specialized subtables are in use.

I think it would be good to add a NEWS item, as people profiling OVS's functions
will see different function names, and having called out the DPCLS Function 
Pointer
changes, and why they are there would be beneficial.

I will draft a separate patch for NEWS item - so we can keep it parallel to 
this patch set.
Shout if that is not a good approach :)

I would think it could be added as part of patch 5 of the series as that's when the performance increase is introduced? Anyway it's minor enough that if there is not another revision of the series it can be done upon commit.

Regards
Ian

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to