On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 2:33 PM Yi-Hung Wei <yihung....@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 11:43 AM Darrell Ball <dlu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Sure, circling back to this part.... > > > > yep, it is the Linux In-tree kernel module rather than OVS tree module > > > > dball@ubuntu:~/ovs$ modinfo openvswitch > > filename: > /lib/modules/5.0.0-23-generic/kernel/net/openvswitch/openvswitch.ko > > alias: net-pf-16-proto-16-family-ovs_ct_limit > > alias: net-pf-16-proto-16-family-ovs_meter > > alias: net-pf-16-proto-16-family-ovs_packet > > alias: net-pf-16-proto-16-family-ovs_flow > > alias: net-pf-16-proto-16-family-ovs_vport > > alias: net-pf-16-proto-16-family-ovs_datapath > > license: GPL > > description: Open vSwitch switching datapath > > srcversion: 12850657561FB87D174A001 > > depends: > nf_conntrack,nf_nat,nf_conncount,libcrc32c,nf_nat_ipv6,nf_nat_ipv4,nf_defrag_ipv6,nsh > > retpoline: Y > > intree: Y > > name: openvswitch > > vermagic: 5.0.0-23-generic SMP mod_unload > > signat: PKCS#7 > > signer: > > sig_key: > > sig_hashalgo: md4 > > > > btw, similarly > > make 'check-kernel' fails for the same reasons. > > > > Ostensibly, I would have expected 5.0 to be ok. > > I can dig more on this part later if you wish. > > The ct timeout feature is introduced in 5.2 kernel, so 'make > check-kernel' is expected to fail on 5.0 kernel. The upstream kernel > support for ct timeout feature is documented at > "Documentation/faq/releases.rst" in the patch 4. > sure, I had another version in mind for some reason > > > > btw, I think a timeout policy not being applied should not result in > packet blackholing. > > I think we need to make this better. > > Sure, we can definitely make it better. I am focusing on some other > issue now, but I will have a follow up patch that only translate the > ct timeout attribute when the datapath does support that. > I had a brief look at the incremental, but probing for the support is the standard approach. > > Thanks, > > -Yi-Hung > > > > A timeout policy is just a nice to have 'thingy' after all. > > > > That being said, I would like to see Xenial working (with OVS in-tree > module) with higher priority. > > > > Thanks Darrell > _______________________________________________ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
