Hello, On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 2:13 PM Ilya Maximets <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 14.10.2019 20:04, Aaron Conole wrote: > > David Marchand <[email protected]> writes: > > > >> Add a coverage counter to help diagnose contention on the vhost txqs. > >> This is seen as dropped packets on the physical ports for rates that > >> are usually handled fine by OVS. > >> Document how to further debug this contention with perf. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: David Marchand <[email protected]> > >> --- > >> Changelog since v1: > >> - added documentation as a bonus: not sure this is the right place, or if > >> it > >> really makes sense to enter into such details. But I still find it > >> useful. > >> Comments? > > > > It's useful, and I think it makes sense here. > > That's an interesting debug method, but it looks not very suitable > for an end-user documentation. One thing that bothers me the most > is referencing C code snippets in this kind of documentation.
Ok, can we conclude on the coverage counter wrt the v1 then? https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1153238/ Should I submit a v3 with the doc update (but removing the parts about perf) ? Thanks. -- David Marchand _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
