On 11.11.2019 17:11, Ilya Maximets wrote: >>> I'm not sure if clang annotations will work with rte_spinlock. >>> DPDK doesn't have proper annotations for locking functions. >>> >> >> Ah, good point, I didn't check the lock type. In that case nevermind, >> patch+incremental LGTM as is. >> >> Acked-by: Kevin Traynor <ktray...@redhat.com> > > Thanks. In this case, I think, there is no need to re-spin the series. > I'll just squash the incremental with this patch and give it another try. > If it'll work fine, I'll apply the series.
Thanks Sriram and Kevin! Series applied to master. Best regards, Ilya Maximets. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
