On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 04:51:35PM -0500, Aaron Conole wrote: > Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> writes: > > > Not every system will have recvmmsg(), so introduce compatibility code > > that will allow it to be used blindly from the rest of the tree. > > > > This assumes that recvmmsg() and sendmmsg() are either both present or > > both absent in system libraries and headers. > > > > CC: Yi Yang <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> > > --- > > I haven't actually tested this! > > I have trouble understanding the motivation for this patch. Will > there be an attempt to rewrite netlink-socket or netdev-linux to use > recvmmsg? Simply adding this function with no new callers seems like > introducing dead code. I'd expect the next version to include some > in-tree user.
This is relevant to Yi Yang's patch: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1204939/ I should have referred to it or put it in his thread, sorry. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
