Simon Horman <[email protected]> writes: > On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 03:25:06AM -0500, Aaron Conole wrote: >> Simon Horman <[email protected]> writes: >> >> > From: John Hurley <[email protected]> >> > >> > Openstack may set an skb mark of 0 in tunnel rules. This is considered to >> > be an unused/unset value. However, it prevents the rule from being >> > offloaded. >> > >> > Check if the key value of the skb mark is 0 when it is in use (mask is >> > set to all ones). If it is then ignore the field and continue with TC >> > offload. >> > >> > Only the exact-match case is covered by this patch as it addresses the >> > Openstack use-case and seems most robust against feature evolution: f.e. in >> > future there may exist hardware offload scenarios where an operation, such >> > as a BPF offload, sets the SKB mark before proceeding tho the in-HW OVS. >> > datapath. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: John Hurley <[email protected]> >> > Co-Authored: Simon Horman <[email protected]> >> > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <[email protected]> >> > >> > --- >> >> With the change to the Co-Authored tag: >> >> Acked-by: Aaron Conole <[email protected]> > > Thanks, pushed to master. > > My feeling is that this is a fix and appropriate for backporting. > Do you have any thoughts on that?
Sorry for the late response - I was traveling. Yes, please do. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
