On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 12:18 PM Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 11:36:19AM -0800, Pravin Shelar wrote: > > Another option would be to add new command that install and execute > > packet in same netlink msg. That would save us a netlink msg to handle > > a miss-call. what do you think about it? > > When I experimented with that in the past, I found that it didn't have a > noticeable impact on performance. > Reduced number of msgs sent here would help in certain situations. It is also simpler to fix the stats issue using this approach.
> If it did help, then I don't think we'd need a new command, we could > just add a OVS_FLOW_ATTR_PACKET to attach a packet to the existing > OVS_FLOW_CMD_NEW or OVS_FLOW_CMD_SET commands. Sounds good. Thanks. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
